-
Welcome to NoFap! We have disabled new forum accounts from being registered for the time being. In the meantime, you can join our weekly accountability groups.Dismiss Notice
Post published by CPilot
I was inspired by a post here concerning the three stages of temptation. Speaking specifically to our struggle, the first stage, a glimpse of a pretty face or form is not a sin. The second stage, when we let ourselves linger over the image for our own pleasure is venial sin and of course the final stage where we give into sinful ways is a more serious sin.
Until, I took these thoughts onboard, I had forgotten (probably since my childhood catechism) that the second stage is a venial sin. I had completely diminished the seriousness of venial sin and its role in leading to mortal sin. Now, I am trying to focus on avoiding such venial sins as a means to recognize and throw off the temptation the devil constantly puts in front of us all.
Many times this is not easy as I still have a longing to return to my old life. However, I have found a good tool to fight this is to not only pray for God's help when I am tempted but also to promise Him I will avoid such sins for the next hour or for the morning, afternoon, etc. These small promises are powerful and the benefits are wonderful.
José Bonaparte, ZigZebedy, ADMG and 1 other person like this.
more_vert
more_vert
WOODROW
Clarification--reading a nice wholesome book or simply trying to get sleep. No nocturnal emissions, living a chaste pure life and BINGO--out of the blue--an O occurs. I have read about "double effect" in moral theology. We do something good but a negative happens. This topic has been on my mind very much. If there is good moral theology book I can read please let me know. I really like the gym and wholesome activities
exsoldier likes this.
more_vert
ADMG
In terms of good moral theology, Servais Pinkaers comes highly recommended. I have his book, "The Sources of Christian Ethics," but haven't delved into it yet... it's a pretty big read. Some of his other titles, like "Morality: The Catholic View" are shorter and more accessible (so I have heard). You can also try looking at JP II's encyclical "Veritatis Splendor." I don't think he discusses double effect much in that, but it's a beautiful work of moral theology.
more_vert
WOODROW
I know that nocturnal emissions are not culpable. What about if one is doing e cercises like biking, jogging or innocently doing a workout at home?? can be a bit of a nuisance indeed. I only went through college seminary back in the 70s..no moral theology...did know of a good priest at Fordham U. here in New York.
more_vert
ADMG
You're asking a lot of questions about "action theory," of which principle of double effect is probably the most famous aspect. You'll get slightly different answers from many orthodox philosophers like Martin Rhonheimmer, John Finnis, and Edward Feser (less of a moral philosopher, per se, and more of an Aquinas scholar). But all would likely be agreed that there would be no sin here, unless you were intending the orgasm... although there might be an issue if it is a common experience for you and you are not seeking out alternative workouts that would avoid the issue of orgasm.
more_vert
WOODROW
Thank you for your answer. I do appreciate it. So the main thing is to keep in mind is intention. This sure does help. Alternative workouts has been on my list in the past. One situation can be tricky---unmarried guy in middle of nite gets a few erections (forgive me for my description) does everything to get back to sleep..maybe solution is to take a walk around the block if other methods don't work.