No groups should be immune from criticism.

Naturally, I do agree.

 

We should be able to look critically at things. Although we have our own biases so we usually don't look at the things we believe and the group's we are apart of critically.

 

I agree provided the spirit of criticism is transparent, well intended, not inquisitional.

 

Yup.
I think NoFap is a genuinely good cause mired in pseudoscience and anecdotal evidence to the point where it's becoming a meme.

 

Criticism is good. Calling out things that are evil or misguided is good. But all-out insults shouldn’t be done.

 

I don't get it.

 

Oh well.
Still think NoFap is becoming a meme itself.

 

Would you qualify with "as long as the 'facts' are made crystal clear and not falsified"?

I think a lot of criticism is due to people believing fake information.

 

I'm not sure that's true, if you trust the polls (which I don't much, eg, 99% of hillary winning in 2016). He seems to be about equal to when elected: https://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Donald_Trump
Excerpt:" As of September 27, 2019, the United States Senate has confirmed 152 Article III judges nominated by President Trump, including 2 Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, 43 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, 105 judges for the United States District Courts, and 2 judges for the United States Court of International Trade.[2] There are currently 37 nominations to Article III courts awaiting Senate action, including 4 for the Courts of Appeals and 33 for the District Courts.[3] There are currently 4 vacancies on the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 92 vacancies on the U.S. District Courts, 2 vacancies on the U.S. Court of International Trade,[3] and 12 announced federal judicial vacancies that will occur before the end of Trump's first term (3 for the Courts of Appeals and 9 for District Courts)."