Curcumcision Induced Sexual ED

So glad I have a foreskin! Circumcision is mutilation.

 

yayyyyyy
me too
BUT - the foreskin actually makes masturbation less painful...

 

I have a condition calles frenulum breve and my foreskin is too tight for me to fully retract it when erect.

As a result it limits my sensitivity while having normal intercourse (ofc I know how to make myself come by MO).

I have a urologist appointment next month. I'm quite sure they'll tell me I need either to get my frenulum removed but most likely I'll have to get a full circumcision. I'm actually quite worried to lose all sensitivity.

@Gladiatori did you just get circumcised? How old are you?

 

Me, too. Routine infant circumcision is mutilation for sure!

 

well it has some benefits to it .Let's not hate on circumcision if a few people had a bad experience.Yes it removes some of sensitivity but it is not that noticeable.And it also has some health benefits like being more safe from infections in that area.

 

Google skinmedica

edit: also I keep worrying that circumcision caused my ED. I wonder how much foreskin restoration costs (or if the entire organ could be cloned and reattached in a few decades)

 

Ok. U guys really convinced me not to get circumcision. I'll do frenulum removal and foreskin stretching.

 

All of those health benefits can be experienced through not being a slob and taking care to be hygienic. While circumcision makes sense if you’re a Bronze Age tribal living in the middle of the desert with no soap and no running water it’s hard to justify it in our modern day and age.

 

It is mostly a cultural thing and it does have benefits.The sensibility you lose is not noticeable.And it looks better.

 

As someone circumcised I can definitely say that I'm not crazy sensitive down there. Another trade-off is that masturbating, though possible with nothing, feels insanely better with lube, lotion etc. However, I don't really regret it. It's possible to finish, I've done so multiple times, even with a condom. I had some times when I couldn't finish but then again I was frequently PMOing.

 

No way. A natural penis looks better, not one that had been surgically altered. You cannot improve on perfection (by God).

 

This is such a good point Guy. The way some people talk, you might imagine that people with a foreskin are often getting infections. It is like any other part of the body, it functions (and smells) perfectly OK when cleaned. Simple as that tbh.

 

What perfection?There is nothing perfect with a human body

 

It is as close to perfection as nature can achieve within the time it has been given so far.

Artificially altering a natural, non-malignant, unobstructive part of the body merely for cosmetic and religious beliefs does not suit the body, hence the difficulties experienced by several circumcised gentlemen.

 

What difficulties .Isn't it interesting that most pornstars are circumcised.They don't seem to have any problems what about muslim countries their birth rates are very high and yet they are circumcised.

 

Yeah, because most porn stars are American, lol. Circumcised men make up only 1/3 of all men. Porn does not reflect this.

 

Most male porn stars tend to struggle with achieving an orgasm and because of that they tend to have problems with maintaining erections. Because of that most of them are on boner pills or even injections. So using porn actors is not a good example. Plus, I believe the average consensus on this site is that porn is not very representative of the objective reality anyway.