Washing the penis - personal hygiene

Reducing the sensitisation to reach goals is not a very good approach. According to this logic those who are addicted to sweets and alcoh should reduce their tongue sensitivity and those who are addicted to video games should deliberately reduce their vision. If we apply this same logic to female fapstranauts then we end up with supporting circumcision of women too, which is frowned upon by almost all women who are aware of its consequences.

The motive to circumcise based on the idea of desentisation is not only unnecessary but also gives a wrong approach to quiting PMO. Quiting PMO and standing above addiction and tempation is not to do with the desensitisation of external body parts but instead it is more to do with the mind.

To quit PMO one does not need to be circumcised. To last longer in bed and satisfying one's girl or wife, one need not desentise the head of their penis through circumcision. There are plenty of people in the world who are uncircumcised who can last for hours in bed satisfying their spouses. There are plenty of people who have quit PMO not needing circumcision at all. Therefore the need for circumcision purely on the basis of desensitisation is not a fair trade off provided that that was the sole motivation for an individual to go for that (especially due to pressure from society).

This is not a matter of which is better - circumcision or being intact. They are both important for those who voluntarily opt for such choices without being pressured by society, out of their own free will.

Some boys and men, reluctantly circumcise because pressure from potential dating partners who dont directly have to deal with the consequences. This is not an exercise of free will and its capitulation towards pressure.