Anti-Masturbation in the 1800s

No porn, masturbation, orgasm is interpreted as no pmo by most members. You have to jack off your own dick to porn in order to do pmo. No masturbation, orgasm is interpreted by most members as no mo, you need to jack off your own dick to fantasies in your head to do it - doing it while looking out of a window is like porn, and doing it in front of someone qualifies it as a sex act. "Reaching my own goals" is ambiguous.

 

I read it as an English statement: "No porn, masturbation, orgasm". But given the evidence in your previous post you make a good argument. It does appear to say no to porn, but yes to masturbation. That I cannot agree with. If this is the case then the "NoFap" name is misleading, since fapping is just another word for jacking off, "NoJackingOff" would be the same thing. However, if you look in the recovery journals of the straight males here -which is what I read since that's my demographic - approach this as I have reported, that is, as a way to quit jacking off entirely, and start living a more satisfying life over all with sexual experience happening only with real women. Thus the nofap twitter does not agree with the opinion of a significant portion of its members, and does not represent them, and I have said earlier that it does not represent me in many cases.

 

Yes. On further consideration you are correct. Nofap is my enemy then, but not the majority of members who agree with me and take the same position as I do that all masturbation is wrong, and that only real sex with the hottest chicks you can get is acceptable. I'm glad I didn't give these fuckers any money. I will change the name of my counter to meeting my goals too.

 

Yes. I support some of the members, but not the website itself, Alexander Rhodes, or anyone else who is pro-masturbation.

 

PLOT TWIST!
The language on the "Set up your badge" section says "Abstaining from: porn and masturbation and orgasm". It's been so long that I didn't remember. This does not match the statement on twitter. Thus it appears to be that the choice is ours, to a degree. Were you being intentionally misleading like a post-modernist leftist LGBTQ tends to be? I assume you are one considering your smug syntax.

EDIT: This is a mistake on my part. There actually is no "no mo" badge. So it actually does match the statement on twitter.

 

That was to StarRider. No mo is a badge option, look at the options, we were both fooled.

 

Yeah. You're right. What the hell that isn't there.

 

The thing about porn - any kind of porn, whether it's hardcore, camgirls, chicks dancing naked, bikini girls bouncing around - is that it's not even interesting if you don't touch yourself while looking at it. It's just a terrible movie with no plot, and almost no production value. How many people are addicted, or even interested in just watching porn like a regular movie? lol, "I gotta see how this one ends". Or getting off to looking at women in movies, tv shows, sports, news anchors etc. it's pretty much impossible to get addicted if you don't touch yourself while doing it, because it's just not that interesting.

It was always off topic. I changed the title because it's not "Nofap in the 1800s", because nofap is actually pro-masturbation, which makes no damn sense considering it's very name, it's actually anti-masturbation in the 1800's, and being anti-masturbation makes all the sense in the world. Porn only becomes a problem by being a tool for intensifying masturbation and making it harder to quit, porn by itself is just too stupid without the masturbation, it's just a weird curiosity or a shocking thing you look at only once and say "wtf?" then move on.