Women Are Not A Monolith!

So you are hybrid is what you are saying? Man-woman, or Woman-man? Bispiritual? Transformer? I don't know there are so many labels nowdays that I lost count, back in my day we just called people Manly woman or Femenine man...

Because at the end of the day both do both but the average distribution is what created the tags to begin with.

I was fully agreeing with until this

There is nature, not everything is societal, if you want to tag it a or b, eggs or fries, pears or apples, masculine or femenine, is up to you, but nature exist, and from that nature comes the average, and then you have the rest of the distribution and it's quadrillion small differences.

We are all a bunch of apes wanting to fit in our peer groups, and then we have the apes that throw stones at their peer group, and create a new peer group based on throwing stones to the other group, and that's basically history and humans affairs in a nutshell.

 

Try making a tinder with pics of an average/worse looking male friend.

 

Masculine and feminine nature is not a subjective concept inherently. Quite the opposite actually.

Masculinity is a real thing that only males have.

Femininity is a real thing that only females have.

Though, a male can look and act more feminine and vise-versa. BUT, a man who acts more like a women than he does a man, does not have a feminine nature in his soul. He has an effeminate male soul. (Which he should change over time).

Feminine nature:
Soft
Pleasant
Sweet
Mostly submissive
Naturally better at nurture
More emotional
Weaker and in need of more support
Seriously desires and needs to be loved

Masculine:
Strength
Confidence
Leadership
Direction
More goal oriented and visionary
Desires love but also wants to earn respect
Desires to provide and be the leader, while his women loves him and helps/supports him with his vision.

 

I recommend it, its a good movie.

 

You're so right. Watching Julia Shaws AMA on Instagram live last summer where she talked being bisexual and being in a relationship with a man showed me that what we think of female attraction varies from person to person. Sometimes I see guys on this forum posting stuff about what women like with the assumption that every woman likes the same thing.

 

I don't think it is wrong to follow generalized traits in women, because they exist in most women for the reason. You can say it is evolution, or you can say can say God made it like this. At the end whatever view you have this traits do exist. Some people demonize all women, but man who criticize some group of women for something valid he is more likely to get slap on the wrist for doing so, and he will also be accused of hating women. God forbid if you criticize promiscuous women, God forbid if you say that women are not same or equal to the man. I am not demonizing women, but I am wiling to demonize woman who I think is doing more harm to others. I do think we live in era of Gynocentrism, where we generally think of a women as a victims of man's behavior, and oh so bad man who just want to dominate women. There are so many factors in this Gynocentric society that made some good women into unreliable, and you can blame thirsty betas out there fot this all the way to the common mindset that women are the real victims in the society.

 

I mean that was the point, my arguments are based on my own biases and how I see myself as an ape and what do I throw stones at hahahaha, it's my way of saying, HEY, this is how I see things, but bear in mind my view is full of shit just as yours or anybody else's.

Well I think is a mixture, there are nature tendencies of behaviour, and nurture based tendencies of behaviour, and of course the societal landscape plays a big rol in all of it.

They can understand math? I though they were dimwits with flower pots instead of a brain and uncapable of logical thinking at all. Lmao You know, just like men are ice-cold retards uncapable of any emotion or emotional intelligence. (Disclaimer for actual dimwits: I'm kidding alright?)

I'm quite certain that it goes much more deeper than just that, and that it is no such an unidimensional thing.
That analysis is just shallow to my understanding, not wrong, just shallow considering how complex of a thing it is.
Too many factors, nature, nurture, cultural landscape, hormone levels, neurotransmitters levels, health condition... again is just simply not something that you can say A or B, but we can categorically say the mode is A and the mode is B.

So if you have one sets of numbers, group A, 3,6,7,1,3,5,2,3,9,3,4, ALL NUMBERS OF GROUP A ARE 3!, Wrong, but you can see why that generalization comes from. Same goes with men/women and personality traits.

Why there is that mode, again, is a sum up of many different factors, and nature, and hormone levels play a rol in it, and certainly there is disparity on those factors. Is not all cultural, not by a long shot. It plays a big rol on stereotypes, sure thing, but is not reduced to just that, specially when it comes to personality traits, not stereotypical behaviour like your teeth example.

Again, me ape, me male, me like throwing stones at things

 

Holding extreme views as you call it is not a problem, but holding unexamined views is problem.
Evaluate something as a extreme view can be subjective. You can say that people who think that pedophiles should be
punished with death have extreme view, and at the other end of other spectrum you have negative extreme views like all
black people need to die which is unexamined and wrong view.

 

I agree, I was just using the word "extreme" in a very general sense to get the point across as simply as I could.

 

First off I'm not upset lol. That's the bigger assumption right there. Sure it's partially in the matches but it's also the way that people talk to you that changes. In my experience using average looking profiles of both genders the women reply with little effort like the men are disposable while men try their hardest. It's simply that women automatically have social credibility while men have to earn it. & yeah the disparity in matches is also annoying.
There's other stuff as well like the number of women that have blm in their dating bios but then when you actually look at dating app stats black men do disproportionally worse. It seems to me that women just say whatever's praised by the majority for the sake of validation even when their actions reflect otherwise. I think female conformity stems from being more agreeable on average in big 5 personality tests.
You can say that it's just the women on the dating app but the same shit applies to all of social media (though to different degrees based on the platform) & sure you could say it's just online & people act differently in real life but in real life, people are subjected to different social pressures. The internet gives you the space you need to express what you actually think. I could never say what I'm typing rn without social repercussions.

 

That man doesn't have a female soul. He has a male soul. He can choose to bark like a dog all his life too, but he still has a male soul. He has been corrupted if he does so, and needs to walk in the nature he was given.

 

I meant stating that those behaviours are acted JUST because of positive reinforcement in society.

Sure, thanks for the stone by the way, I'm heading out to see to whom or what throw it to now, good talk.

 

Didnt know the stonage monolths where a group of woman gattering around

 

Have to admit I thought of 2001 .. "It's origin and purpose are still a total mystery." Sorry