1. Welcome to NoFap! We have disabled new forum accounts from being registered for the time being. In the meantime, you can join our weekly accountability groups.
    Dismiss Notice

Shut out/down a girl at the gym...

Discussion in 'Abstinence, Retention, and Sexual Transmutation' started by Warrior4Freedom, May 9, 2022.

  1. lirider

    lirider Fapstronaut

    64
    92
    18
    This has been happening and warned about since Biblical times. Avert your glances.
     
    Warrior4Freedom and danhuk like this.
  2. Ice22

    Ice22 Fapstronaut

    320
    1,960
    123
    False Power is to get laid with 1000 women.
    True Power is 1000 days on Semen Retention.

    Semen Retention > Sex

    Semen Retention is: Preserving , Building , Creating, Strengthening, Healing
    Casual Sex is: Wasting, Draining, Weakness
    Baby-making is: Using the Female force and the Masculine force combined to create a New Life (Sexual Energy being used for something Good)

    (Then there are other ways of having sex without ejaculation, etc, but most people don't know how to do that.)

    It is obvious that losing your seed - is losing a piece of yourself. It comes at a price.

    You waste it and it's gone.

    When a man impregnates a woman he gives a piece of himself to her to create new life.

    To consciously waste this energy by using fantasies and/or images is to turn away from your own your life-force/life, and that causes suffering as a result. You can't empty yourself of life and at the same time be full of it.

    Sexual Energy is like fire. You must respect it and have it under your control. An analogy is a fireplace in a house. If you let it get out of hand you may get burned, or even burn the whole house down.
    You need to add firewood to the fire otherwise it will burn out.
    (Eat the right foods, exercise, transmute that energy into something creative, healthy and positive in your life.)
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2022
  3. Warrior4Freedom

    Warrior4Freedom Fapstronaut

    477
    999
    123
    Hey ippo bai ippo, thank you for your thoughtful and thought-provoking response to my situation. You called out a lot of truths, and called me out on those truths. I will respond to everyone who took the time and thought to post meaningful responses, even if it's not in chronological order. It absolutely isn't anything personal - just whatever resonates within me to write at a given time.

    Not to worry - your words were direct, but did not rub me the wrong way. I appreciate hearing it - I suppose they were insights I intuitively knew; I just believed I was acting the "right" way. I'm sincerely trying to tone myself down; to just "be" in a state of surrender. To let Spirit transcend conditioning (an important process for you, from what I've read in your Continuum 3 thread).

    You strike me as a very compassionate, insightful person and I am thankful you've been following my progress in the age section. From the glimpses I've taken at your thread in that section, that compassion shines through, and you don't deserve the struggles you're enduring that lead you to be posting on this forum. While I mean to peruse your (earlier) thread more deeply and intimately, I recall seeing that you have a SO.

    In your response to me, you told me the chaotic world of emotions await. And that you humbly encourage me to minimize rather to exclude them completely.

    Keeping in mind that you endorse intimate/emotional relationships with women, and that you are in one, why are you on this forum? Or, why do you have a partner? I mean these questions with zero hostility, even if it may come across that way. Why is there a disparity between intimacy (which I assume includes sex) with your partner and that tendency to struggle with urges to PMO?

    I don't mean to demand answers as much as to provoke contemplation. I argue that it is in fact the chaotic world of emotions - which includes relationships - that keep us in the psycho-physio-emotional world that leads us here (to this forum). There is rarely a harmony in that world; there is rarely a balance; there is rarely an equilibrium. If there were, individuals and relationships would look a LOT different - probably of the polyamorous type with less entanglements and more friendly yet meaningful familiarity. That's another topic, though. Not sure humanity would even do that.

    The other end of the continuum, then, would be the monks. The yogis. The spiritual seekers who go on SE for spiritual reasons. Which includes celibacy and no romantic relationships. My focus on this, here on this thread, is not on making this a permanent mode of living, but on its purpose. They seek transcendence. They seek triumph. Liberation. Equilibrium. Let's stick with transcendence, actually. Transcendence includes detachment. Transcendence implies involvement, not entanglement. In this State, emotions aren't excluded. They're included, but they're engaged with in the healthiest, most sweet ways possible. This may mean minimally.

    I suppose this is what I have been trying to achieve. Ironically, so rigorously and ruthlessly so that I'd - as I mentioned - felt inhuman in public around women (especially the tempting/teasing kind) because I know what falling into that weakened, hormonally-driven state is like. And I know women abet us going there by provocatively dressing. They probably don't know the true detrimental effect it has on us; they're more into the power-trip.

    Even if I get into a relationship, I know that - given my disposition - I'm likely to be confused, anxious/nervous, be a bit too pandering, compromising my boundaries, peace etc. Especially so as I assume I'd be having sex - which, if not for reproduction, is just wasting seed/energy/essence/power. SE is truly tied to cognitive/spiritual power, and in a relationship this is fucked (pun unintended) with. When a relationship ends, I remember every careless act - be it by me or her - and am upended by pain/grief.

    There's beautiful things about being human, but horrid things as well. They're both sides of the same coin. I argue for transcendence. Transcendence may include qualities from both sides of the coin, but they're raised up and cleansed in such a way that they are for Good. For betterment. For Realness. Healthy, spiritual Realness.

    To be human is to be in a chaos of pain and pleasure. In romance/relationships, you want to be free of a person while at the same time entangle yourself with them. You want to build a life with them yet at the same time run away. They take you to highs, and some brutal lows. You have both the most moving compassion for them and the most irksome annoyance. You serve them/your life together and yet you wonder what else. You can't win. You're just awash in it all. You lose intimate connection with the Earth, the soil and wind and trees. The stars. You basically see these things as the stage or backdrop for your romantic life or whatever life generally you're living according to emotions/ambition. This is another reason I argue for spirituality and transcendence (and I've been there): you're connected more intrinsically to the Earth and capital-L Life, yet not disconnected from emotions - you just experience the latter more purely, pristinely and powerfully.

    So for me, until I realize that way of Being, I cannot afford to trip up. Which is why I felt "inhuman" - I took it on too arduously. But my stance stands - I must reach that way of Being. But I must be gentle with myself and therefore others while at it. I'll know - or I trust I know- when the right time to be intimately engaged with a woman is. My point of this thread is that those gym girls ain't helping, and hence why I responded ruthlessly, or feel like I did, and am seeking support/solidarity. Thank you, yet again, for your well-elucidated, compassionate insights. I definitely embrace your thoughts, learned from them, and would welcome any more you may have.

    And P.S. - Congrats on your latest streak. :emoji_thumbsup::emoji_thumbsup:
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2022
  4. Warrior4Freedom

    Warrior4Freedom Fapstronaut

    477
    999
    123
    Thank you, Meshuga. I'll hit you up with a more elaborate response than this one, soon. Just wanted to say thanks.
     
  5. Meshuga

    Meshuga Fapstronaut

    2,164
    3,962
    143
    Holy crap @matibeatles , if a guy did that around a woman there’s a better than even chance she’d be disgusted, and a decent chance she’d get authorities involved. Wouldn’t be unjustified in doing so, that’s creepy. I guess that shows a couple differences between men and women. Since men tend to be bigger, stronger, and more aggressive, a guy doing that would be considered a threat. Since it was a woman directing it toward a man, though, it was just an (inappropriate) invitation. Crazy.

    I think I agree with basically everything @ippo bai ippo said. Some observations are different from mine, but it’s just a slightly different interpretation based on perspective. The only reason I didn’t think the situation was 100% projection was because of the second girl. One girl stretching doesn’t mean necessarily anything. A girl has to stretch somewhere. The fact that you’re on SR and looking for validation for that lifestyle is enough to make you want to see things that don’t exist. But the second girl seemed to agree that something was going on. Now that I think of it, though, her behavior could have been a signal to the first one that she was being too obvious. There’s no way to know what was going on unless you talked about it. Another thing, ippo is 100% spot on that it’s inconsistent to expect them to be the one to start a conversation, if it’s a conversation you want. I assumed you didn’t want a conversation, since you’re on this SR thing.

    And speaking for myself, I don’t hang out in this section specifically. I looked at recent posts across the forum, and thought the headline was interesting enough to read.
     
    Warrior4Freedom likes this.
  6. Warrior4Freedom

    Warrior4Freedom Fapstronaut

    477
    999
    123
    Thank you for your post, Ice22.

    I have to say I agree with your words 100% and don't have anything to add. Since joining nofap, there have been many perspectives proffered to me that romantic sex within a committed relationship is acceptable, but barring reproduction even this seems basically like mutual PMO to me. Of course the warmth of a woman's body is lovely in terms of cuddling - which may lead to sex - but I think one must be prepared to conceive/reproduce in such an encounter, and not go the path of contraception....the latter is basically, as you said, wasting your life force.
     
    Ice22 and lord_nelson like this.
  7. Warrior4Freedom

    Warrior4Freedom Fapstronaut

    477
    999
    123
    Shutting down/out girls isn't a pleasant feeling. I don't enjoy going to my current gym because of this; not only because I tend to shut down/out girls and think I need to do that at this stage, but also because people generally get affected by whatever energetic aura I'm emitting and they don't seem to have it sit well within them.

    Another instance of the topic of this thread: I walked into the gym with a disposition of focus and meditativeness; a girl apparently saw me before I saw her. She had a knowing smile on her lips and her eyes were cast down as she did her workout. I know she saw me before I did her. She didn't look at me when I looked at her, so I simply moved on and went to my workout machine, continuing my laser-focus. I think at that point she was wondering why I wasn't noticing her (keep in mind she didn't maintain looking at me when she saw me).

    This was the general theme of that workout session. Continued my focus. She increasingly seemed to become unsettled and insecure/uncertain. When I thought it right to look her way, she'd already stumbled away. I think this is the default state of younger women; they just put up a huge front where they identify with their appearance/jobs/culture/religion whatever. Were I a more established man in my SR journey (at 100 days now), this is probably a good opportunity to approach; to provide them with the guidance and caring attention they privately recognize they need.

    Did that sound douchey? Probably. I probably also need to see it as an opportunity to be more emotionally sensitive if I ever wish to have a female companion. They have totally bought into the idea that their looks are the pull factor. :emoji_confused:
     
    becomingreat likes this.
  8. Brahmacharya_UK

    Brahmacharya_UK Fapstronaut

    553
    1,516
    123
    @Warrior4Freedom. I happened upon your thread and it really impacted me.
    This is female nature in a nutshell!
    I applaud your laser focus and your journey of retention.
     
  9. Meshuga

    Meshuga Fapstronaut

    2,164
    3,962
    143
    It’s not mutual PMO. I can offer the scientific perspective, the Christian perspective, and I’m not as versed in it but a little of the Eastern perspective as well.

    Stroking your own self with erotic stimulation only, or probably mainly, produces dopamine. That’s a short term pleasure neurotransmitter designed to get you to replicate whatever behavior you just engaged in. Porn and masturbation is basically a hack. Sex, however, is a much more complex activity. Skin to skin contact releases oxytocin, the bonding hormone. It’s the same hormone that bonds mothers and infants. With real sex, not the kind you see in porn where it’s transactional, manipulative usury, or movies or TV where they’re tearing off clothes in desperate, impulsive passion, but real relationship sex, there’s lots of communication. Verbal and non-verbal, eye contact, caring for one another. That helps with serotonin, a long term happiness hormone. You could write a book on the physical and chemical reactions that occur during sex that don’t with masturbation. Well, not you. Not me either, but a book could be written.

    You may not buy into everything Judaism has to say, but at minimum they have an incredibly ancient tradition and access to old wisdom. Their creation myth is unique in that they claim man was made to reflect the essence of God. Man alone, however, was incomplete, insufficient to fulfill the task. God did not declare His creation complete until woman was also created. Together, as a pair, they reflect the magnificence of divinity. Judaism further says that a man leaves his father and his mother, and joins with his wife, singular, and the two “will become one flesh.” It clearly supports marriage in a pair bonded relationship, not polygamous. Further texts condemn the use of prostitutes, pleading with men not to “forsake the wife of your youth.” Prophecies draw analogies between the sexual relationship of a married couple, and the relationship between the people and their God. Sex continues to reflect the divine, a symbol of the most sacred relationship, but only in a paired bond. Jesus’ instruction further elaborates, saying it’s not just the act of adultery or rape that is sin, but lust itself, and he does indicate masturbation as well as leering at women, is sin. According to Christianity, PMO is harmful to the self and to one’s relationship with God. However, marriage is still upheld as sacred.

    Some Eastern traditions also recognize the difference in spiritual impact between masturbation and real sex. The practice of karezza in particular, that is non-ejaculatory sex, is described as creating a positive spiritual feedback loop between the distinctly male and female energies. If you want to maintain your SR lifestyle and also enjoy a romantic and sexual relationship, this should be of interest to you.

    Finally, I find @Brahmacharya_UK ’s comment about “female nature in a nutshell” to be narrow minded and mildly hypocritical. I assume we are all porn addicts. It wasn’t long ago that we ourselves were rewarding women for this kind of behavior. You can’t teach them this is the way to get your attention, then change your mind and expect all of culture to change with you. Porn isn’t natural at all, and the way we have conducted ourselves is not natural. It’s no surprise it’s infected women as well.
     
  10. matibeatles

    matibeatles Fapstronaut

    19
    16
    3
    So now this is what's going on: as I am a Literature professor I have female students. They are all adults from 18 to 25 yo.
    We talk about sexual subjects and terms, there's no big deal with it, because there's a law here and we must have this kind of discussions in class (from prophylaxis to abortion or sexual diversity). Anyway, lately they started to joke more and more, and they began to make them "bawdy" as they were hotter and they do it frequently. I mean they insist on this, althought maybe there's nothing related to it, although in literary readings there is always something to comment about sex or eroticism. They say to me in example:
    "Give me a ten so my boyfriend will make love to me tonight as a prize."
    "It's better in the darkness"
    "Let's look for vulgar synonyms of ass"
    and things like that, sometimes more direct sometimes not.
    I mean, it's clear they are more confident with me, anyway I dont want to get confuse, I should not cross a line, maybe I should become more serious or respectful, even it could feel unconfrtably. But is it the power of NoFap or their attitude could feel sometimes quite agressive?
     
    danhuk and Warrior4Freedom like this.
  11. Meshuga

    Meshuga Fapstronaut

    2,164
    3,962
    143
    Oh hey, I’m a lit student. Formal studies over, but I never stop learning, I hope. Yeah, Lord Byron, Oscar Wilde, Geoffrey Chaucer, D.H. Lawrence, and if there’s not an obvious connection to sex, somebody will make one. I had a prof. tell us once that the Big Bad Wolf’s ears in Little Red Riding Hood are phallic symbols. Two penises, growing out of his head. And of course the red cloak represents her first menses. The humanities are obsessed with sex. Sometimes I think college instructors intentionally dream up ways to relate sex to their subject, so they can basically do porn at work.

    You’re talking about your students, though. How long has this escalated sexual talk from the girls been going on? Are you asking if this is related to SR? How do the boys in the class react? Who are the girls looking at, directly and side eye, when they drop these statements?

    There are a number of reasons they could be saying these things. Could have something to do with you. In fact it definitely does have something to do with you, they feel safe using these statements with you. Why they feel safe, though, and exactly what they are getting out of it, isn’t obvious.
     
    danhuk likes this.
  12. Warrior4Freedom

    Warrior4Freedom Fapstronaut

    477
    999
    123
    Barring the remainder of what the referenced religions say, I do agree with their stance on the male-female sexual and interpersonal dynamic here. Where religions go askew, however, is they omit the necessity of either party (male and female) to self-actualize before such union occurs. Self-actualization, knowing the essence of oneself, wasn't a big thing in religious times; basically one was their religion and sex served basically to propagate it. This is why there are all sorts of psychological trauma and severely mentally messed-up individuals (including myself) who were raised religiously and have to live in contemporary society where such mental oppression and suppression isn't required anymore. Regardless of time and place, too, cognitive dissonance is enough to make one seek truth, if he doesn't go insane.

    Regarding kareeza, that definitely isn't for me. I just do not see how it would help my current process. I do see how it could work in terms of intimate female/male bonding; i.e. cuddling and lovely comfort. I've done that before without an erection.
     
  13. Warrior4Freedom

    Warrior4Freedom Fapstronaut

    477
    999
    123
    To my mind, I think they're just being young and therefore immature and yes, aggressive. They sound like a high school boys' locker room, actually.

    The power of NoFap, were it to work on those students, would have them be more reserved, respectful and polite. Perhaps you are not emphasizing the teacher + student dynamic more? I know this is hard to do when everyone is adults, but for the sake of a smooth-running workplace and execution of classes, sometimes this is required.

    NoFap also increases your mental acuity. Arguably, you wouldn't be swayed by these suggestive comments on a heightened retention streak. Furthermore, even if there was a particular student you'd like to prospect romantically, I don't think that one would be uttering that stuff.

    I hear you on literature being filled with sexual/illicit stuff, though. I was a Lit Major myself.
     
  14. Warrior4Freedom

    Warrior4Freedom Fapstronaut

    477
    999
    123
    I went to a poetry reading last night, and some of the poems read were extremely triggering for me, for essentially pornographic acts were being described under the literature-infused notion of "love". I rode it out, though, even if I wanted to get the hell outta there.
     
  15. matibeatles

    matibeatles Fapstronaut

    19
    16
    3
    Yes, and we were talking about Edipus. .) Last week we read it and discussed about it, now we have some activities. And next week we're talking about Sci-fi with a chapter of Black Mirror series, "All your history". That's all, there's no more time. This semester is ending, let s see what happens.
    Maybe I wasnt clear enough. This group is part of a government plan for those students who want to finish their interrupted secondary studies. So the concept of a traditional class is distorted a bit. It works with small groups where the main objective is the link with state institution (school) instead of the specific knowledge of the subject (Literature). They are still formal workshops.
     
    Meshuga and danhuk like this.
  16. matibeatles

    matibeatles Fapstronaut

    19
    16
    3
    We read a lot here O. Wilde. In fact I was about to read in this class some of his children stories like "the happy prince" or "the selfish giant" (I dont know if those are the right titles in English).

    As for what you ask me, these concerns were there from the first day but they grew. For example, the first day when I asked what was their motivation to go back to high school, one of them, a girl, replied: "I'm running away from my boyfriend."
    The boys are quite shy. And I can't say that all the comments are directed at me, but when I left the classroom for a second, one of them said to another: "You go to the bathroom too." And they started laughing.

    I don't know, as a professional I don't respond to this situation until it seems out of place or absolutely obvious, then I'll have to have a conversation to stop. Anyway, the semester ends next week.
     
    Meshuga likes this.
  17. Meshuga

    Meshuga Fapstronaut

    2,164
    3,962
    143
    Ok @matibeatles , I’m picking up this is your first semester teaching? And I’m sorry, I’m so North American it hurts, I take it this is roughly high school material (age 16-18) but you said the students themselves are 18-25? And this is a sort of experimental program, I’m assuming it’s socially progressive.

    I’m not sure why running away from a boyfriend is sexual, but I’m guessing I missed some context.

    Given all this information, I don’t think their sexual comments have much to do with you. Or at least, they aren’t trying to seduce you or any other men in the room.

    I don’t know about Argentina for sure, but here in the States, women of this age are strongly pressured to act like this, especially in academic settings. They are taught that coarse and vulgar talk, and wearing their sexuality on their sleeve, is contradicting cultural norms and is empowering. It’s what they have to do to reverse oppressive gendered culture differences and fight the patriarchy. If they do this, they get positive reinforcement from most of their instructors and in your case, they probably see that it gets under your skin and they think it’s funny. Similarly, young men are seen as oppressors, undeserving beneficiaries of the patriarchy, and their mere presence is a physical threat. The belief is that men claim to be strong and competent, but they are really weak and have fragile egos. They are made to felt welcome only if they toe the feminist line and apologize. Therefore, your female students are going to be more aggressive and outspoken, and your males will be quiet and intimidated.

    These kids are still young and impressionable. They don’t know who they are, or what they ought to be. The girls are trying on a new persona, and the boys are just trying to get through with as little trouble as possible. Hang in there. Semester’s almost over.
     
    lord_nelson likes this.
  18. matibeatles

    matibeatles Fapstronaut

    19
    16
    3
    I do agree, and I understand your point. I believe that's the way it is here in Argentina BUT in academic context where we are going through those changes, and society is continually in tension, each one expressing their part. Here in Argentina there is talk of a "crack" that politically and economically divides everything: And as you can imagine, "divide and you will succeed."
    Anyway, in this specific group girls are more relaxed, I mean in a mood way, cool?, and they joke constantly about everything. When I said boys are shy, I didnt explain there's only one boy, and he's the youngest person inside the group (18 y.o.). So they tend to protect him as a child, not even close to an agression.
    Although there is talk of feminism, the phenomenon is not observed in the lower classes, where these educational programs are carried out. They are more traditional. In fact, I like to talk about it with my students and usually they dont agree about everything on the feminist concept, which is quite wide. In any case, we try to make women aware of their rights and they are, but always maintaining respect for the other. I mean, possibly the most radical feminism is observed in the academic environment or in the big cities. But here we can see some public acts like pissing in the church, or painting the street against patryarchy and the main palace with green, the colour of abortion. And things like that.
    The important thing is not to generalize, there is a great diversity of social groups here, and they all respond to their interests and personal history.
    In this kind of group there are other problems which are before feminism and we try to solve like drugs addiction, theft, parental absence, early pregnancy, and consequences of poverty, including traffic chaos as a result of poor civic education among others.
     
    Meshuga likes this.
  19. Warrior4Freedom

    Warrior4Freedom Fapstronaut

    477
    999
    123
    More gym vibes....

    Until today, things have more or less remained the same as per my initial post.

    Today:
    Went to another gym; same frame of mind. Retained focus; refrained from glancing at yoga-pantsed/tight shorted girls. Interestingly, I had a unique set on the treadmill. However, that's digressing.

    I went over to do pull-ups at a squat rack, where there was a racked barbell sitting on the floor in front of said rack. No one was immediately near it, so I first asked the dude to the left if he's using it/the squat rack; he said no. Asked aforementioned yoga-pantsed girl if she was, she said yes. There was some negotiational banter between her and me; good-natured and occasionally humorous (on my end). I told her I'd use the squat rack next to hers to do the pull-ups; however, it was higher (I'd have to jump to reach the pull-up bars). I pointed that out and she offered to switch sets with me on her rack (shut up, guys) but I told her it's ok, I can jump and hold onto the bars in the adjacent rack; I'd done it before and it was fun and challenging.

    I'd settled into being about to do that, when she brought me a gym stool. Very considerate of her. I used it for my entire workout; it did help. She brought another gym stool which I assumed was one of the pair and I thanked her for it, but didn't take it. In any case, I now think she brought it to rest her water bottle and phone upon, so that she could video herself doing her pelvic thrusts with the barbell. She finished her workout and looked weary to remove all the plates from her barbell, so she took a drink then began. I went over and lifted her barbell at an angle so she could slide the plates off, instead of arduously twisting and dragging them out. She was grateful; gushed in thanks. There was a distinct point where I wondered (former sim*p?) if I should help her clear her other heavy stuff away, but sensing this she pointed back to my workout area and said it's ok, continue with your workout. She left my area, forgot her water bottle and phone, came back to my area, took it, went to another area. I finished my pull-ups, went to where she was to do pushups. No further acknowledgment or exchange from and by either of us. I think this goes back to the initial post of mine in this thread; fighting the side of me that wants to "do extra", or glance in romantic interest etc...I had no way of knowing if she was spoken for and besides I absolutely fucking suck at flirting and prefer not to be awkward...

    That was the end of it. No further acknowledgement or exchange, some workouts in front of each other in the pushup section, then I left.

    It was a nice human exchange, awkwardness aside, I guess. Kindness, thoughtfulness, compassion. I may not be 100% regular-dude due to SR, NoFap and meditative devotion, but at least I was aware enough to offer her assistance with the weights, which the other "normal" dudes around her were going to let her go ahead and struggle with it on her own. And she was thoughtful to me in the first place.

    If I was PMO-ing, or even on a narrower streak, I'd have probably tried to make eye contact with her at the onset (entering the gym) because she was attractive and in yoga pants, tried to look at her via the gym mirrors and likely completely avoided the pullup bar area where she was because I was too shy or otherwise feeling like shit due to a relapse or prior PMO.

    Some progress, I guess, with the sexy-female interaction and not being intimidated by or glorifying them. It's just the uncertainties outside of that (romantic curiosity, flirtation, temptation to sim*p etc) that I'm now a born-again virgin at, and I become closed off to. I think they can sense that latter energy and reciprocate it. And really, why risk vulnerable energy on someone just based off of appearance? Surely there's a spiritual lesson to be had in not doing that...
     
    Kieran2121 and Meshuga like this.
  20. Redemptionisrequired

    Redemptionisrequired Fapstronaut

    2,102
    13,154
    143
    Thank you for sharing this, you've cultivated the ultimate form of restraint and reminded me of a valuable lesson in carrying my meditation into my day to day activities.

    Social media/Youtube/TikTok has made it quite easy for men to fall prey to a thirst trap, even worse OnlyFans, which feeds off the lonely man. The sirens in the Odyssey. I do believe training meditation and semen retention is a way to combat and undo the learned behaviour. This shakes a woman of the type you mentioned, off balance.

    I feel I need to share this, shortly after my 30 minute meditation session yesterday I decided to visit nofap. And by coincidence read your post, following to that I studied a bit of Marcus Aurelius's Meditation's and this is what I read, which is fully in line with what you mentioned:

    "Repentance is a kind of self-reproof for having neglected something useful ; but that which is good must be something useful, and the perfect good man should look after it. But not such man would ever repent of having refused any sensual pleasure. Pleasure then, is neither good nor useful."

    My understanding is as follows:

    -Repent something useful that was neglected (I.e Meditation, exercise, proper diet and good sleep care)
    -What is good to us is useful to us (I don't mean in a manipulative or morally wrong way)
    -The perfect good man (useful to his duty/life calling) should look after what is useful, meaning hone and care for it. (I.e Honing meditation, to hone your mind and presence in your day to day activities)
    -Refusing sensual pleasure does not require repentance, as any pleasure of that sort (i.e porn, mindless social media/TV) is neither good, nor useful, it does harm to us.

    Bonus from another quote

    -Look at the thing you desire or hold, what is it made of, what impact does it have on the world? Are all important questions.
     

Share This Page