Romance novels are female porn lol.
I've been saying this for years.
My passion on this subject might appear disproportionate, but my educational background is heavy in literature and contemporary fiction, with a cross section of deep antipathy for porn. I've heard a lot of pushback on this claim, that romance fiction is analogous with porn, mostly from women. Some are weirdly defensive from a "sex positive" angle, saying
porn is porn,
erotica is written porn, and women enjoy both separately from romance novels. I already understand these are different genres, and that women are perfectly capable of enjoying visual media, the physical aspects of romantic relationships, and/or straight up lust. I do not claim visual porn is not porn for women, or that romance fiction is the exact same form as erotica and should carry similar stigma. I am claiming romance fiction is the same in too many aspects of
function as porn to ignore, and I think if men and women both could recognize how at best, both porn and romance fiction are cringe inducing, and at worst introduce serious problems in real world relationships, that we could understand the other's contempt for our favorite vice-media a little better.
I started to go into a rant but I won't post it. Suffice it to say, I dislike romance fiction, possibly to an irrational degree, and I find it hypocritical of women to defend romance fiction for their own use while RIGHTFULLY condemning porn for themselves and their husbands/boyfriends/men in general. I fully acknowledge written media does not physically exploit real world men in the same way visual porn physically exploits real world girls and women, and for that reason alone it is appropriate to hate visual porn and the people who produce it more than romance fiction and the authors that write it. However, when it comes to heaping contempt on the people who consume either, I find the condemnation lopsided.
I have
opinions.