Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Abstinence, Retention, and Sexual Transmutation' started by PeacockS, Apr 15, 2019.
A very important topic is now left among sarcasms, the futile aggressive debates.
Aggressive? No, it’s just a bit of sarcasm and is mild at best. Either way, are you aware that when you hug for at least ten to twenty seconds your brain puts out oxytocin? This hormone is a key ingredient in building a bond with a partner or friend, and when having sex with a person regardless of wanting a child or wearing a rubber that hormone is still released.
Your brain doesn’t get destroyed, maybe if you have a severe addiction that’ll mess with chemicals and what have you but in healthy folks sex isn’t a problem
the point is when you keep releasing oxytocin and dopamine by doing sex a lot, there would be abuse of this mechanism and this is so powerful activity that levels of these hormones by sex cannot be compensated without sex.
brain will always want you to have sex because it is wired in our evolution to propagate life, and gives a feeling of happiness and satisfaction, but that feeling is fake and you need to keep doing it daily to keep those levels high. other activities would look bland as compared to sex.
your body needs satisfaction it does not care anything else. its your work to tame your desires.
but nowadays people are like sex gives me happiness and thats why i keep doing it, obviously it is made to give you happiness but its fake happiness and abuse of one bodily mechanism.
so sex is done just for happiness nowadays and thats pretty shallow meaning attached to it.
listen to me carefully, any person making a bond in relationship solely/disproportionately high portion to sex is going to damage their relation sooner or later. people would want to release those above mentioned hormones with anybody who is willing. hence infidelity and divorce rate is going high. out body dont know faithfulness, morality, ethics it just want to extend itself that is LIFE. and to achieve it there are decoys deployed by our body which are hormones, so that your sane mind dont question your insatiable desire of sexual activity.
tell me one thing, if someone given 10 years and with unlimited number of partners and asked to do sex with anyone he/she want. what to you think after 10 years of sexual life with enough experiences our body fulfills its desire for it? the person would crave sex immediately after lapse of 10 year period.
sex is momentary. its an activity of creating life, dont mystify it by saying n number of things, like its important to body, this that. it is strictly a function of body like eyes to see, kidney to purify blood, brain to think etc.
in old times people were not always free to have sex all the time, they didnot have comfortable houses so they sleep together, they needed to protect their crops from animals, hunt , go on voyages, long war marches etc. it is the side -effect of modernity that science has given enough opportunity to limit other hardships of life and exploit one mechanism of body to get happiness.
read a little about philosophy and sociology. you'll know what sex is and how it has changed in modern times and exploitation of sexuality by multinational companies to get profit.
are you from england?
you need to say sorry for jallianwala bagh massacre.
Yawn, your long winded and boring write up amounted to one thing, abusing sex like people abuse porn. That has nothing to do with what OP said, he straight up claimed that orgasms ruin relationships in general if procreation isn’t involved which is 100% untrue.
In healthy people dopamine release is normal and is not an issue, you don’t just automatically become addicted to sex just because you’re able to have it whenever you want. Best of all this had nothing to do with multiple partners either and now you’re bringing in the olden days to “prove” your point? I’m done feeding into your strawman argument.
And now you’re you’re bringing that into here? Even though that has nothing to do with me or my current generation, you need to apologise to all the women of your own bloody country for being stoned and forced into marriages. At least that massacre was back then but yet your discrimination, sexual violence and arrogance towards women is still going on there, how many of your own people have/still continue to get brutally beaten and murdered by having rocks pellets at them or worse? Disgusting.
Oh wait, I thought we were talking about relationships and orgasms...
And where crime against women doesnot happen?
You are too ignorant girl, stoning is not practiced in my country. That is so stupid an accusation. That crime i have never heard happened in india in my 27 years of age. It is a serious crime. Talk to me on facts on crime and not speculation you resident of cold nation.
Yeah rapes happen, i am so sorry these thing happen. But crimes now are attracting severe punishment after 2011 verma committee recommendation.
And girl i have learnt you'll keep arguing so its better I'll stay shut.
Do you take pride is putting stupid counter arguments like you countered my post in being long and boring, that's one of the most stupid tactic to win argument. Talk some sense to me.
I agree with you on one point that having sex secrete pleasure hormones. But for everything else you lack depth and unable to understand, even if i try you'll stay ignorant.
I have heard a saying "its always a loss in arguing with ignorant people"
So forgive me girl. I tried to be reasonable with you.
Your PM Theresa may regretted for jaliawala bagh massacre in a speech recently but did not apologise for that to happen.
It is not current generation but it'll remain a blot on british history.
The general population of london even contributed huge monetary purse to general dyer and hunter commission exonerated him of any wrong doing. Thats so shameful a history. Killing so many peaceful people gathered for a festival and that devil dyer without even giving any warning ordered shoot to kill on children, women, old people celebrating baisakhi in jalianwala bagh, the only exit to that park was blocked by troops of dyer and innocent people were butchered. Women and children jumped in well at park and it is said that well was half filled with corpses of dead people.
Our generation deserve an apology.
Reasonable, right... you obviously just wanted to start a little fight, why else would you bring up that massacre that actually literally had nothing to do with British folks or what was being said.
I don’t regret it one bit in the sense that not only was it not my generation, it had literally nothing to do with me. You are aware that Dyer was Indian born right? Doesn’t matter if he was funded or not by the British. Either way again, this has nothing to do with the topic on hand and is just sad you thought you had to bring this up.
Lets agree to disagree. I dont have anything negative for you ginny.
I have never met any british, so i brought-up that massacre issue. I wanted to talk about that fateful incident on 13th april 1919 with an english.
You'll be shocked if i tell you all acts and even legal acts of british during colonialism in their colonies.
But history is gone. Leave it! Peace
I could have been born in yemen! Does that make me theirs?
My dear friend from which part of your body you keep your thinking, tell me where, where????
Tell me, I'll start thinking from that part, at least it would make me ignorant to anything and everything.
It does not matter to you if he was funded or not by british? He was army officer in army when india used to be british colony.
Bringing it up for no reason is not only weird when that’s not what was being talked about, and frankly just insulting just because I’m British. I know of everything seeing as I live here, but every country has baggage, yours included.
Why not? The English apparently have to answer for Dyer’s reckless action. Again, I don’t care and nobody has to answer for anything that happened long ago.
Leave it ginny, lets not discuss that further. You are too stubborn to accept anything.
Don’t bring up a daft debate that not only I didn’t ask for, but has nothing to do with anything at hand.
What is at hand is beyond your imagination, sex is one of the most pleasurable activities to humans on earth. The most. Orgasms are pleasurable but doesn't mean healthy
Right? Omg, I can't even with this guy. He brings up some completely unrelated thing that has nothing to do with you, and then gets all mad when you keep talking about it and telling you to "leave history in the past." Dude, YOU are the one who brought it into the present! Nobody else was talking about that until you brought it up. So weird.
Oh, and I love that he gets mad that such an "important discussion" was interrupted by one sarcastic response, but then he completely details the entire thread with some nonsense that has nothing to do with anything.
This is actually incredibly bigoted language here. You're completely discriminating against her for where she was born. You do realize she had no control over that, and that she had nothing to do with whatever horrible acts British people did years and years ago? Are you a man? Should I start telling you all the horrible ways women have suffered at the hands of men throughout history, as if it's your personal responsibility to apologize for it because you happened to be born male? Ridiculous. Of course not, because that would be extremely sexist.
In terms of too much dopamine, porn mixed with masturbation abuse is far worse than just sex, while sex releases lots of hormones and chemicals including dopamine it’s nowhere near as bad as the latter. There is literally nothing wrong in any way with a loving couple having sex, unless of course they abuse it to the point of it becoming an addiction.