Wait for it to come all the way back around the Earth.
XD I admit your response made me chuckle a little bit. But because you answered that, realistically, you have no vehicle to actually
catch up to the car because in this scenario, that car was the only car, right?
So with that, please explain to me the following:
If the Earth is orbitting the sun at 67,000 or so miles per hour, isn't the moon also going the same speed as it perfectly follows and rotates us? So why did they fly
TO the moon? If it allegedly took 3 days to get there, if they just waited in place for the moon to come to them, it would've taken less than 4 hours.
Secondly, how would they have ever gotten to the moon in the first place?
We've already established that the Earth is orbitting the sun at 67,000 mph and the moon is also going at least roughly that same speed.
But the fastest recorded rocket speed is only about 36,000 mph. So that already puts a hole in my earlier example because realistically, they wouldn't have been able to park themselves in front of the moon and just wait. But wouldn't this mean they wouldn't have been able
catch up to it either? Or is the atmosphere of space also like the atmosphere of Earth?
Explain to me how they
perfectly timed a landing with absolutely zero fatal errors on a celestial object moving faster than any rocket we've ever built. Because so far, the only way I can see the moon landing event being real is if the astronauts were horribly
left behind in space.
Now before I mention the following, I should note that the following is
NOT proof that we didn't go to the moon. I'm only mentioning this because everything in the story should be considered.
It should be noted that at the Apollo 11 Post-Flight Press Conference, all of the astronauts looked absolutely
miserable. Armstrong went mostly into hiding and Aldrin became an alcoholic. These men went to the
MOON.
I don't know about you, but I'd be absolutely elated knowing that I was a member of the small group that actually went beyond the reaches of Earth. Hell, I'd probably chastise nearly every single celebrity, telling them that their accomplishments were
NOTHING compared to mine.
I certainly wouldn't be able to stop talking about it. Hell, my inner poet would probably come out because I just experienced something I could never even imagine and I could've horribly died, but
didn't.
The point is, they didn't react anywhere near like that at all. Isn't that at least just a little bit strange?
Now one should have to agree that if we really did go to the moon, it was man's greatest achievment. Right? But, following Freedom Of Information requests in America, NASA admitted it had lost all their original video footage of the Apollo Missions. Also allegedly beamed back from the moon was voice data, biomedical monitoring data, and telemetry data to monitor the location and mechanical functioning of the spaceship. All this date was about 13,000 reels and literally
ALL of them are "missing".
Also missing, according to NASA and its various subcontractors, are the original plans/blueprints for the lunar modules. And for the spacesuits and lunar rovers. And for the entire multi-sectioned Saturn V rockets.
Explain to me how it's easier to believe that NASA royally screwed up
SO BAD to have lost the entire alleged record of the moon landings rather than think that the data never existed at all.
What if the Catholic Church said:
"We had undeniable proof and data of God on 13,000 reels. But we lost it."
13,000 reels of data is about 900 boxes. How does a large organization lose literally
EVERY single box?
You, with a sound mind in this scenario, would immediately jump to the conclusion that they never had this data in the first place. Why is the Moon Landing an exception?
. The guy who travelled the world in 80 days didn't build his transport but surely has more to be proud because he figured it. Those others guys just supposedly did some physical training and dreamed hard about Star Wars saga.