Yet I agree with everything you said!This is so hard to answer. I’m a Lord of the Rings guy through and through, but I have a lot of admiration for Harry Potter as I’ve gotten older (I’ve been reading ancient English literature like Arthurian tales and Beowulf, and it’s made me see things in Harry Potter that I think are interesting, even though I haven’t read it since I was very young).
Politically, I can’t identify with either side in America. I don’t think Trump’s election was stolen, but I also don’t think trans women are women (sorry, mods). I think socialism has proven to alleviate certain social and environmental ailments that run rampant in America but I think regulated capitalism is the best system we have currently. I have a pretty long record in academia and so I have a fondness for universities, but I know for a fact that critical theory has run rampant and is destroying certain disciplines in the university and creating new bullsh** majors. I’d love to talk about this last point in detail.
I also loathe the victimhood that characterizes the left, but I would support outreach and rehabilitation programs for poor neighborhoods and people.
I also love guns and support the second amendment.
I live in a big Texas city, and I get hissed at by liberals and conservatives alike. My principles seem totally out of wack with any party in America and I mean that honestly.
I think he was trying to write "conference"
There are some quasi-political themes I can point finger to. Lord reveres history, nations, simple life, beauty. Potter speaks of escaping your upbringing, changing who you are, it celebrates the weird and quirky. There's probably a lot more I can't see. The two worlds have very different feels to them.
I started this thread because so far I've been able to tell a twitter person's leanings based off of whether they'd been lotrposting or hpposting 100% of time. Apparently I did not go through a large enough sample though.
Aside from its Catholic fan base, LOTR appealed heavily to the hippie generation though. Tolkien wasn’t in a world concerned with the ridiculous assertions of the far left/ right today. Not to mention, left and right had different sets of ideas back then. And the guy was a literature professor at Oxford who busted his chops on Beowulf and old English poems.There are some quasi-political themes I can point finger to. Lord reveres history, nations, simple life, beauty. Potter speaks of escaping your upbringing, changing who you are, it celebrates the weird and quirky. There's probably a lot more I can't see. The two worlds have very different feels to them.
I started this thread because so far I've been able to tell a twitter person's leanings based off of whether they'd been lotrposting or hpposting 100% of time. Apparently I did not go through a large enough sample though.
China Miéville said:Tolkien is the wen on the arse of fantasy literature. His oeuvre is massive and contagious - you can't ignore it, so don't even try. The best you can do is consciously try to lance the boil. And there's a lot to dislike - his cod-Wagnerian pomposity, his boys-own-adventure glorying in war, his small-minded and reactionary love for hierarchical status-quos, his belief in absolute morality that blurs moral and political complexity. Tolkien's clichés - elves 'n' dwarfs 'n' magic rings - have spread like viruses. He wrote that the function of fantasy was 'consolation', thereby making it an article of policy that a fantasy writer should mollycoddle the reader.
That is a revolting idea, and one, thankfully, that plenty of fantasists have ignored. From the Surrealists through the pulps - via Mervyn Peake and Mikhael Bulgakov and Stefan Grabinski and Bruno Schulz and Michael Moorcock and M. John Harrison and I could go on - the best writers have used the fantastic aesthetic precisely to challenge, to alienate, to subvert and undermine expectations.
Aside from its Catholic fan base, LOTR appealed heavily to the hippie generation though. Tolkien wasn’t in a world concerned with the ridiculous assertions of the far left/ right today. Not to mention, left and right had different sets of ideas back then. And the guy was a literature professor at Oxford who busted his chops on Beowulf and old English poems.
The modern cultural right’s reappraisal of Medieval values wouldn’t have been a political issue in the ‘60s, and LOTR is a much richer book if you read it through the lens of Medievalism, cultural Christianity, folklore, and Ancient English literature than if you read it as a right-wing post-2015 pamphlet supporting traditionalism. The modern right has taken these as a bulwark against nihilism and cultural egalitarianism (and good for them, sincerely) but Tolkien wrote these books coming out of two world wars, not a bunch of Twitter feuds about wypipo.
Tolkien is pollitical, though I doubt that was his goal (nor even consciously done). But how could a writer not be political?
Miéville's written more, like this in Socialist Review, but I think has since mellowed a bit in his attitude to Tolkien.
I use the same reasoning when I'm asked why don't I have a gf.Groucho Marx said "I don't want to belong to any club that will accept me as a member"
Those are some good points, hp actually might be pretty eh... supremacist? Voldemort was bigoted, but so was the rest of the wizarding world. I think Hagrid explains at one moment that the purpose of the Ministry of Magic is to keep magic in the hands of the chosen: wizards and to exclude Muggles from the benefits that it offers.Thing is, I dont think HP is liberal at all. I dont agree with everything said in this 4chan post but I think it makes several good points, mainly regarding how ass-backwards the universe of HP actually is if you think about it for more than 5 minutes.
I use the same reasoning when I'm asked why don't I have a gf.