This is exactly how many of us feel. To find out that your partner has an entirely separate part of themselves that you didn't know existed is really difficult to accept. The person who you thought you knew so well has all this that you knew nothing about...you do think you don't really know them at all. Many SO's (including me) describe it as feeling like their partner has died.I can just imagine the SO who gets blindsided by the confession that their husband is addicted to PMO. I suspect many lay there and say do I really even know this man at all?
I think this is a significant acknowledgement...one that many might never realize. But, it's such a massive truth for me, and the fact that my husband does not acknowledge this is very painful for me. Besides feeling like he died when I learned about the unknown 'other side' of him, I also feel like parts of me died as well. There are some parts of me that will never recover...things that will never be the same, and I miss my undamaged self. I feel like my boys are being cheated out of having the mom I would've been if I wasn't consumed by betrayal trauma.I'm willing to admit that I most likely destroyed many of these qualities my wife may have shared early on because of my distorted mind.
Perhaps it's sometimes misconstrued, but oftentimes that's exactly what the addict is saying because they are still unable to take on the responsibility for their own choices, and it seems like sex with their partner can make it a lot better. Of course, you have needs. Everyone does, but someone in active addiction doesn't have clarity to even know what their own needs are because everything is about the addiction. Someone who is really in recovery no longer thinks that sex with their SO is necessary for them to stay in recovery. That doesn't mean they don't want it or they don't think it's important. But, they understand that it's separate from their recovery.I think this often gets misconstrued as a PA saying well if you were just having more sex with me I wouldn't PMO. I think a better way of saying that is setting the addiction aside for a minute. I have needs too. I deal with shame too.
The addiction doesn't allow you to see how it affects your wife. It actually prevents that. So, to say you were in survival mode is exactly right...in order for the addiction to survive, you were not able to acknowledge how it affected her.For me I think I just had a hard time actually seeing what my addiction was doing this whole time and how it affected my wife. For me at least I was in survival mode through much of my addiction. Just get through the day..
Perhaps it's sometimes misconstrued, but oftentimes that's exactly what the addict is saying because they are still unable to take on the responsibility for their own choices, and it seems like sex with their partner can make it a lot better. Of course, you have needs. Everyone does, but someone in active addiction doesn't have clarity to even know what their own needs are because everything is about the addiction. Someone who is really in recovery no longer thinks that sex with their SO is necessary for them to stay in recovery. That doesn't mean they don't want it or they don't think it's important. But, they understand that it's separate from their recovery.
You nailed it. I feel like my husband destroyed the best parts of me. The part that trusted people. The part that loved sex and thought it was sacred. The part that believed he loved me and would be there for me. The part that thought if you loved someone they would return that love. The happy, carefree, confident girl, who thought she could conquer the world. Who thought she could do anything she set her mind to. We are left trying to salvage a relationship where there is no trust, very little hope, no real desire on my part to “ work” at it anymore. Fighting not to let bitterness and resentment drown out the blessings I have experienced. Trying to believe that the happy moments were not all lies.Yes, I agree that it's an important part of the recovery process to develop an understanding of the SO's betrayal trauma and to learn empathy as well. Unfortunately, addiction is very selfish and it prevents one from considering how their actions affect others, and therefore, this is usually one of the last things that addicts are able to accomplish in their recovery. However, I have noticed that the sooner the addict is able to do this, the more successful their recovery seems to be. It's the ones who aren't able to break out of the self-centeredness that continue to struggle. I realize it's not easy because so many things must be overcome to do that...complete honesty with themselves and others, acknowledging their faults, humility, no longer being controlled by shame, sitting with their SO's pain, and many other things, none of which they want to do. But, for the relationship to truly heal, it has to happen at some point.
This is exactly how many of us feel. To find out that your partner has an entirely separate part of themselves that you didn't know existed is really difficult to accept. The person who you thought you knew so well has all this that you knew nothing about...you do think you don't really know them at all. Many SO's (including me) describe it as feeling like their partner has died.
Then, you start thinking back through all the time you've been together and realize how you believed your life was a certain way, but now you know it wasn't actually that way at all. That really sucks, too, because it feels like your life has been a lie all along.
I think this is a significant acknowledgement...one that many might never realize. But, it's such a massive truth for me, and the fact that my husband does not acknowledge this is very painful for me. Besides feeling like he died when I learned about the unknown 'other side' of him, I also feel like parts of me died as well. There are some parts of me that will never recover...things that will never be the same, and I miss my undamaged self. I feel like my boys are being cheated out of having the mom I would've been if I wasn't consumed by betrayal trauma.
Perhaps it's sometimes misconstrued, but oftentimes that's exactly what the addict is saying because they are still unable to take on the responsibility for their own choices, and it seems like sex with their partner can make it a lot better. Of course, you have needs. Everyone does, but someone in active addiction doesn't have clarity to even know what their own needs are because everything is about the addiction. Someone who is really in recovery no longer thinks that sex with their SO is necessary for them to stay in recovery. That doesn't mean they don't want it or they don't think it's important. But, they understand that it's separate from their recovery.
The addiction doesn't allow you to see how it affects your wife. It actually prevents that. So, to say you were in survival mode is exactly right...in order for the addiction to survive, you were not able to acknowledge how it affected her.
Unfortunately, addiction is very selfish and it prevents one from considering how their actions affect others, and therefore, this is usually one of the last things that addicts are able to accomplish in their recovery. However, I have noticed that the sooner the addict is able to do this, the more successful their recovery seems to be.
I don't think any SO believes their partner became a PA just to hurt them. I think most of the time, they were addicted prior to even meeting them.Theres times where I just wish I could say that "I didn't become a P addict to hurt you.". I know it's not a great alibi but it's how my heart feels.
Yeah, that is insensitive, actually. I don't think it's selfish at all to want your partner to not lie to you, deceive you, and make you believe your reality is something other than what it really is...and do all that to protect an addiction that is damaging both the SO and the marriage at the same time it's making the addict into someone other than the person they pretended to be. When the person you love most and who says they love you the same does that to you, you are not selfish for being hurt by it. Even if your intent was 100% selfish and 0% intended to hurt your SO, it doesn't negate the fact that you still chose to do it. Becoming an addict is not an accident. I'm sure no one set out with the intention of becoming an addict, but it still happened...and it continued for however long...because of the choices you made. And, after you were married, those choices continued to be made knowing that they would hurt your SO if they found out.I get too that the addition is selfish. And this is going to come off as insensitive...
Something I as the addict struggle with is that the SOs response is also selfish. It's like "how could you (the addict)do this to me?!".
I think that's agreed upon by everyone involved.I hate that it had to happen.
I don't think it's selfish at all to want your partner to not lie to you, deceive you, and make you believe your reality is something other than what it really is...and do all that to protect an addiction that is damaging both the SO and the marriage at the same time it's making the addict into someone other than the person they pretended to be. When the person you love most and who says they love you the same does that to you, you are not selfish for being hurt by it. Even if your intent was 100% selfish and 0% intended to hurt your SO, it doesn't negate the fact that you still chose to do it. Becoming an addict is not an accident. I'm sure no one set out with the intention of becoming an addict, but it still happened...and it continued for however long...because of the choices you made. And, after you were married, those choices continued to be made knowing that they would hurt your SO if they found out.
100% this.There are some parts of me that will never recover...things that will never be the same, and I miss my undamaged self. I feel like my boys are being cheated out of having the mom I would've been if I wasn't consumed by betrayal trauma.
100% this. Except my qualifier is “ I will never have the relationship l thought I could have with my husband”I will make a happy life, but it will never match the happy I once thought
100% this.
I genuinely used to believe that I deserved to be loved and cherished. I left my first marriage with a PA/SA because I believed I would find someone who did. I will literally never have that ever. It's hard not to resent my children if I'm totally honest. Would I have gotten breast cancer without the pregnancy hormones? Would both of my husbands have cheated on me if I hadn't had the body changes from having children?
I know now that for the rest of my life, I am not going to be in a marriage where I am the thing/person my husband wants. Any husband. I cannot try again with three kids, one a baby, and I love my husband too much to consider it. But it's very much over for me. I will make a happy life, but it will never match the happy I once thought I was good enough to have.
FYI-I wasn’t saying you “ were the worst kind of man” the first sentence was really the part that struck me. In no way do I think my husband is a bad person, he is not. In fact he’s amazing in his own unique way, he has several life saving awards where he risked his own life to save another, he is brave, he is kind, so kind, he has a heart like my father. Addiction gradually stole that. Recovery is finding it again.I can agree with this. I don't think I am resting on any virtue here. I'm simply expressing some important points.
Edit: I would even say that I often don't feel truly understood by my wife in this way that I described above. Typically I would let a post like this trigger my toxic shame. I am not "the worst kind of man" it's taken me a long time to realize that. This is exactly what triggers P addicts back into the addiction. It has taken a lot of work for me to realize I'm not a bad person. I have done bad things, but I am not a bad person. A P addict/Man with "Nice Guy Syndrome" really struggles with this as we don't know the difference.
I did acknowledge that fact in the first sentence of my last post. I do not assume my husband's PA is something he did to intentionally hurt me, and I think most other SO's would agree that they don't think that either. I’ve never thought for one second that's what he meant to do. I know that his addiction has never been about anything but himself, and it started long before I even knew him. I’ve known this since my first D-day so there has never been a time when I was "selfishly assuming" that he tried to, wanted to, intended to, or purposefully hurt me with his PA.I'm saying it is selfish to assume that we intended to inflict that hurt, that we on purpose did the things you mention above. If there can be a certain acknowledgement by the SO that there was not intent to harm maybe that can be the start of the healing process.
It's like "how could you (the addict)do this to me?!".
After establishing that I have never believed there was any intent to harm me with his PA, I could still reasonably ask this question. It's actually a simply-worded, straight-forward question that doesn't require adding a bunch of hidden meanings to it, and it doesn't imply any particular level of culpability. If you feel that it does imply that, I think it's because of the toxic shame you talked about, not because it's asked under the notion that you had malice aforethought.The "how dare you do that to me" mindset is on it's own a self centered emotion.
I'll agree that, as a young boy, there's no awareness at all of the harm being done by P consumption. I said before that I'm sure no one set out with the intention of becoming an addict, regardless of the age it all started. However, there comes a time when you are aware...you know that what you're doing is wrong and that it is hurting people, including yourself, and from that point I believe it is no longer about what happened that you had no control over. Instead, it is about what you do to make things right, and the longer you choose to do nothing but continue in the addiction because you "didn't mean for it to happen," the more it becomes a product of your choices.I adamantly disagree that becoming an addict is not an accident in many (and maybe most) cases especially for a P addict. Yes there is accountability needed here from the fully grown adult addict that it is not ok. What is the average age a young boy is exposed to P? I've heard in the 10 to 11 age group and I've heard that number is dropping fast! I think I heard John Delony say once that some study said age 6 even. Just as a young child can't give consent to have sex at this age and we have laws to protect them, a young boy can't understand what they are seeing. I didn't know how these things would affect me I was hooked before I even was old enough to consent to what I was watching. I was addicted before I had the ability to understand what was going on and have spent most of my life trying to hide the fact that I am addicted.
FYI-I wasn’t saying you “ were the worst kind of man” the first sentence was really the part that struck me. In no way do I think my husband is a bad person, he is not. In fact he’s amazing in his own unique way, he has several life saving awards where he risked his own life to save another, he is brave, he is kind, so kind, he has a heart like my father. Addiction gradually stole that. Recovery is finding it again.
100% it IS marrying someone who hid something and passed it to us and now we're stuck because you conned us.
And no offense (sincerely no offense, I have no horse in your race) but you can say all you want how attracted you are to her, but I do not believe you. If you were capable of fantasizing about having sex with hundreds of other people, you just don't feel that strongly about her. My husband says the same, says he can't get enough of me, is incredibly attracted to me, blah blah blah.
Nope. That's not a thing. I was attracted to my husband. Because of that love and attraction, I was simply never even interested in other people enough to get to the point that I was attracted to them or aroused by them. Ever. That's what happens when you really love and are attracted to your person. You're not capable of fantasizing about others to that extent.