text over videos when relapsing on P.

Yeah in a way it can be worse, in my experience I'd say it's that it can have a deeper psychological effect rather than just the visual stimuli being more of a sensory thing. Videos are mostly shallow but I think we can probably see the connection when you consider how after a while so much of it is so obviously fake, and so you start seeking out what's more realistic whether it's amateur or whatever. So what happens over time is you're looking for more and more realistic stuff to condition your mind with, and for me I think it largely contributes to the self-produced porn, or fantasies even if the narrative is much simpler. For me it's not even so much that the fantasies are a compelling story, but I feel there's a kind of neurological imprint where the believability itself, whatever that consists of becomes imprinted and it's pretty obvious when that comes up vs. just a fleeting thought. I'd imagine it goes deeper if you read longer stuff, for me it was actually pretty short because of not being patient enough and wanting to O.

 

Oh the exception to that would be collaborative porn writing in sexting chats, basically interactive edging.

 

It is actually more common than you think, but specially in women. If you are in this forum, I guess you want to quit porn and I think you have it easier because you have to search that kind of porn instead of visual/porn videos that we can see in a surprise like in instagram or twitter

 

Another thread today was talking about whether people have a vivid visual memory, there's a lot more factors no doubt but in any case a persons inclinations no doubt plays a part.

I wouldn't think of it in terms of media consumption changes a person, but they are "food for thought" so to speak and as building blocks, the higher the level of complexity and nuance the more you can use it to convince yourself - whether that's visual or how the author has weaved together a story. As popular as sex chats are, being a live interaction I'm sure to a more literate person that reads a lot it can be rather stupid, though maybe that also depends on whether someone tends to be more interested in being a spectator anyway. The interactive aspect of chat would do nothing for the spectator who is interested in a better story, to look at only two factors.