THIS is why men need 21 orgasms a month

Mushinja said:
Ok. Maybe ejaculation is good for you, maybe it has no effect. I’m not for or against it either way. Explicit material is the problem. I doubt many people here have a problem with simply masturbating with their eyes closed too much so I don’t find this particularly insightful.
Click to expand...
Try retaining for at least 6 weeks, then try ejaculating every day for a week. I think you’ll notice the difference.
 
Icewarrior said:
Try retaining for at least 6 weeks, then try ejaculating every day for a week. I think you’ll notice the difference.
Click to expand...
I’ll be retaining for a lot longer than that so I’ll respectfully decline that offer for experimentation. At the same time I don’t know what such an experiment would prove.
 
Mushinja said:
I’ll be retaining for a lot longer than that so I’ll respectfully decline that offer for experimentation. At the same time I don’t know what such an experiment would prove.
Click to expand...
You can only find out if you do the experiment yourself. I know that when I retain I feel a lot stronger, both physically and psychologically, than when I ejaculate. I suggested 6 weeks because most folks can’t or don’t want to do more than that. I’ve been retaining (this time round) for 5 months. I don’t intend to stop.
 
It's just pure nonsense. There's a reason pmo addicts don't get wet dreams when they are actively addicted. These claims and studies just want to find a reason to condone this nasty habit.
It takes about 70 days for sperm to mature. Chances are the body will simply expel toxic waste products after this cycle via wet dreams. Deliberate orgasm, especially masturbation, stresses the body, but you will not hear a word about these findings in those studies, since the goal is to find a reason to keep doing it.
 
The follow up indicates a 95% confidence interval on a Volunteer questionnaire….this study sounds like complete bullshit if you ask me. Questionnaires are in general the most uncontrolled scientific collection of information; hence the most useless. 99% confidence is what should be aimed for. If you told me 95% on a double blind or in a controlled environment then we could use that; but 95% on a volunteer study? If you notice on Harvards website doesn’t even link the exact peer reviewed journal.
 
You can also reduce harmful metals and co. by eating clean and healthy. Health is a holistic approach and a learning experience which might start with something like semen retention and evolves to another level then
 
depeche69 said:
https://www.bild.de/ratgeber/gesund...muessen-21-im-monat-kommen-87518124.bild.html

a german article. Here is the translation:
Alone or with a partner: sex keeps men healthy!

Researchers at Harvard University in the US found that men who have frequent orgasms are less likely to develop prostate cancer. This is because regular ejaculations have a positive effect on testosterone levels and physical health.

The researchers are even quite precise and recommend: 21 orgasms a month to reduce the risk of prostate cancer.

The Harvard scientists were able to prove with their study showed that men who ejaculate at least 21 times a month from the age of 20 have a 19 percent lower risk of developing prostate cancer. They were compared with men who do not ejaculate more than seven times a month.

The research team suspects that with frequent ejaculation, harmful, potentially cancer-promoting substances are flushed out of the body more often and more thoroughly.

The harmful substances remain in the prostate for a shorter period of time. This is a gland located behind the bladder in men. During an orgasm, the gland pushes the semen into the urethra via the excretory ducts.
Orgasms for your health!

Other studies also show that regular pleasure is healthy. They strengthen the immune system, ensure better sleep, less stress, a lower risk of depression and better self-esteem.

Men masturbate on average ten times a month up to the age of 25, say the scientists. However, the frequency decreases with increasing age and also in relationships. From now on, men can go back to masturbating more often in old age with a clear conscience ... after all, it's healthy!

Whats your opinion about this?
Click to expand...

To me, this is similar / equivalent argument from the widely adapted medical communities -- high cholesterol will kill you, or red meat is bad for you, or Fat is bad for you type of things.. those have been debunked, and still society / medical community is slow in learning and adapting them, and advocate standard american diet. These are complicated issues involves many factors beyond science, and likely ignores whole bunch of things that are in play. orgasm/ejaculation frequency alone probably isn't the factor in reduction of prostate cancer -- in other words, there are other things that can equally or better mitigating them without many downsides we know comes from MO (incl. ejaculation) alone. You do you, but I listen to my body and mind.
 
JustALearner said:
21 orgasms a month would deplete your kidneys. You will be dry orgasming after a week, as-well as turn into an addiction. I would stay far away from this insane indoctrination to keep men weak.
Click to expand...

when I was married I was having sex basically 1-2 times a day which would mean I was having more than 21 orgasms a month. My kidneys were fine and I wasn’t having any “dry orgasms”.

not sure how you have come to this conclusion
 
Keepitsimple1989 said:
when I was married I was having sex basically 1-2 times a day which would mean I was having more than 21 orgasms a month. My kidneys were fine and I wasn’t having any “dry orgasms”.

not sure how you have come to this conclusion
Click to expand...
If you want to live in a depleted state and not at your peak that’s your choice. You allow a woman to drain your life force energy and when she can’t sense your energy anymore you’ll start catching her looking at other men who don’t release.
 
JustALearner said:
You allow a woman to drain your life force energy and when she can’t sense your energy anymore you’ll start catching her looking at other men who don’t release.
Click to expand...
So, in your opinion, women search for men who don't release at all to..? Drain their energy? I guess if they found out only men in abstinence, they don't stay with them just for fun, but they want to have sex as well. And after the woman drain the energy of that man what she do? Search for another man who don't release? What's your solution to the problem? Searching for women who dislike to have sex? Don't search a woman at all and stay like a monk forever?
 
JustALearner said:
If you want to live in a depleted state and not at your peak that’s your choice. You allow a woman to drain your life force energy and when she can’t sense your energy anymore you’ll start catching her looking at other men who don’t release.
Click to expand...

depleted? What are you talking about? You do realise your comment is a paradox, right? How can a woman go to a man that you claim has “life force” when he won’t even have sex with her? If you are also going to suggest sex without nutting, then you are crazy.

firstly, you didn’t even answer my questions about “shooting empty loads”, you completely avoided answering it.

secondly, I have never had an issue getting women. In fact, I currently have a FWB for the last 10 years and we have been exclusive FWB for the past 4 years, and guess what? We have sex constantly, and here is another crazy thing, she hasn’t left me for another “life force”, want to know why? Because I provide her with great sex, that’s why.

this “life force” you are taking about is nonsense. Women don’t have a 6th sense for a non existence life force when a guy is holding onto his sperm.

If you want to believe in “life force” that’s up to you, but don’t give out misinformation claiming women follow a made up life force.

If this is true, why don’t you share with us how many women you have been with and if you are currently with one, and I will share with you how many women I’ve been with and I have already mentioned I am currently in a FWB situation.

women love sex with their partners, they love men releasing. You are making claims and have nothing to back it off.

also, how would a woman stare at a man who doesn’t release? How would she know he doesn’t release? That statement makes no sense. The only way that women will know is if the man tells he has hasn’t nutted in a long time. Please don’t tell me she will know because she can “sense”, if that’s true, then why do women get with guys that release their sperm in the first place? Why didn’t they “sense” he doesn’t do semen retention? You do realise how crazy this sounds right?

oh and if you are going to ask “then why did your wife leave you” the answer is simple, she didn’t leave me, I left her.
 
Last edited:
kenshin81 said:
So, in your opinion, women search for men who don't release at all to..? Drain their energy? I guess if they found out only men in abstinence, they don't stay with them just for fun, but they want to have sex as well. And after the woman drain the energy of that man what she do? Search for another man who don't release? What's your solution to the problem? Searching for women who dislike to have sex? Don't search a woman at all and stay like a monk forever?
Click to expand...

it’s such nonsense.

the insane things you see people type in this forum is crazy.

most people come here because they have PIED and want to find a way to have sex again, then you have someone telling them “don’t have sex……life force”…..really?
 
kenshin81 said:
Too many myths, legends and personal feelings about SR are passed off as ‘truth’. 95% is just placebo effect and the remaining 5% is just a different change in thinking.
Click to expand...

spot on. It’s the same as people saying “doing nofap gives an aura that women sense” this simple isn’t true, it’s placebo and in their head.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top