THIS is why men need 21 orgasms a month

Yes exactly. The main reason for me to stop PMO is the effect on the brain's dopamine centers.

that’s the best way to look at it, and stopping PMO will definitely balance your dopamine. When your dopamine is balanced, it will give you more time and allow you to he more motivated to do productive things in life.

What I am about to say is just a suggestion, however you do what works for you. I wouldn’t rely on PMO or SR to give to you “special powers” “aura” or “life force”. Reason is because if you don’t notice any change in your life when you do SR or PMO regarding attention from women or people around you treating you differently, it will psychologically/mentally mess with you.

this is just my advice though, you do whatever feels right for you
 
that’s the best way to look at it, and stopping PMO will definitely balance your dopamine. When your dopamine is balanced, it will give you more time and allow you to he more motivated to do productive things in life.

What I am about to say is just a suggestion, however you do what works for you. I wouldn’t rely on PMO or SR to give to you “special powers” “aura” or “life force”. Reason is because if you don’t notice any change in your life when you do SR or PMO regarding attention from women or people around you treating you differently, it will psychologically/mentally mess with you.

this is just my advice though, you do whatever feels right for you
Yep true.
 
There is a doctor in my region. He always says that over masturbation will cause cancer. Then one of my regional news channel humiliated him in a live show and call him sprrading fake news like that. But i still believe him because over faping is the only reason which i got testiclr cncer in 2020. So i am a living example of his statement.
 
All men ejaculate through either masturbation or real sex, so "too much ejaculation will cause cancer" is clearly a fake, otherwise all men would suffer from that or the testicle cancer ratio in men would be extremely high. Why are you linking your testicle cancer with masturbation and not other issue, or maybe even a casual thing?
 
Last edited:
Till my death, i will believe, this demonic fap is the cause of my misfortune. I hate this fap and porn it destroyed my life and still i am doing this.
 
Whats your opinion about this?

Absolute drivel.

They have found a slight correlation between prostate cancer and ejaculation frequency.

1. Prostate cancer risk increases with age with over 60% of cases occurring in those over 65.
2. Male sex drive declines around that age.

A man who gets prostate cancer at age 50 is being lumped together with a man who gets it at age 70. There is zero consideration for age in this study.

Let's say there are 100 men who are age 50 and 200 men who are age 70, all with prostate cancer. The guys who are younger ejaculate three times as much as the older guys. The result is twice as many men having fewer ejaculation frequency resulting in a correlation between prostate cancer and ejaculation frequency.

All they have proven is that older guys ejaculate less, and older guys are more risk of prostate cancer. This isn't even taking into consideration that those with prostate cancer aren't going to want to ejaculate. This is the state of modern science.
 
Last edited:
There is a reason why these researchers are apprehensive when you read the conclusions in these studies. When you actually adjust for confounding factors, the differences between these populations are pretty small and they do not have any strong theories as to why this would be the case. They are simply not at a stage to make sound recommendations. Just don't tell that the journalists that know that you can make good money telling people that the easy thing is also the best thing.
 

Just read that. It addresses this topic well.
 
You could make the case that if you don't masturbate or watch porn, your legs would fall off and your eyes would melt. I wouldn't care. Those things hurt my soul and as much as I want to take care of my body, it can't live without a spirit.
 
https://www.bild.de/ratgeber/gesund...muessen-21-im-monat-kommen-87518124.bild.html

a german article. Here is the translation:
Alone or with a partner: sex keeps men healthy!

Researchers at Harvard University in the US found that men who have frequent orgasms are less likely to develop prostate cancer. This is because regular ejaculations have a positive effect on testosterone levels and physical health.

The researchers are even quite precise and recommend: 21 orgasms a month to reduce the risk of prostate cancer.

The Harvard scientists were able to prove with their study showed that men who ejaculate at least 21 times a month from the age of 20 have a 19 percent lower risk of developing prostate cancer. They were compared with men who do not ejaculate more than seven times a month.

The research team suspects that with frequent ejaculation, harmful, potentially cancer-promoting substances are flushed out of the body more often and more thoroughly.

The harmful substances remain in the prostate for a shorter period of time. This is a gland located behind the bladder in men. During an orgasm, the gland pushes the semen into the urethra via the excretory ducts.
Orgasms for your health!

Other studies also show that regular pleasure is healthy. They strengthen the immune system, ensure better sleep, less stress, a lower risk of depression and better self-esteem.

Men masturbate on average ten times a month up to the age of 25, say the scientists. However, the frequency decreases with increasing age and also in relationships. From now on, men can go back to masturbating more often in old age with a clear conscience ... after all, it's healthy!


Whats your opinion about this?
This is all bullshit, what a way to destroy men’s health. It is like the 50-60s when tobacco used to be healthy, doctors were smoking and advertising on TV.
We should just accept we don’t know everything about human body and this is just another research study which might not be true.

I would just say masturbate everyday for a month and then retain for a month. Based on that see how you feel, whichever month makes you feel better do that.

Also this research doesn’t say that people who don’t masturbate that often are at increased risk of prostate cancer.
 
This is all bullshit, what a way to destroy men’s health. It is like the 50-60s when tobacco used to be healthy, doctors were smoking and advertising on TV.
We should just accept we don’t know everything about human body and this is just another research study which might not be true.

I would just say masturbate everyday for a month and then retain for a month. Based on that see how you feel, whichever month makes you feel better do that.

Also this research doesn’t say that people who don’t masturbate that often are at increased risk of prostate cancer.
well said
 
A very good doctor in NL had a podcast where he mentioned that the relation between prostate cancer and ejaculation is a correlation and not causation.

Because: Healthy people that workout and eat well have a higher libido and ejaculate more often. So, it is not necessarily the number of ejaculations that prevent prostate cancer.
 
This is all bullshit, what a way to destroy men’s health. It is like the 50-60s when tobacco used to be healthy, doctors were smoking and advertising on TV.
We should just accept we don’t know everything about human body and this is just another research study which might not be true.

I would just say masturbate everyday for a month and then retain for a month. Based on that see how you feel, whichever month makes you feel better do that.

Also this research doesn’t say that people who don’t masturbate that often are at increased risk of prostate cancer.
Exactly!!! Lobby is a huge and dirty part in these studies.
 
Look i am gonna be honest..healthy masturbation is good..but 21 times ?..it requires a lot of self control...i think it would be difficult for someone to control himself..so nofap can help..frankly i wouldnt do 21 times...

I do believe that the buildup and stagnation of fluid..become oxidated and become toxic..then why not have more sex instead?..it would be healthier.

Next is cutting down on alcohol...eating more veggies e.g frequently intaking tomato based meals reduced the risk..taking more balanced meals..using medicines like proscar and avodart..avoiding supplements for vitamins..reducing intake of cheese..milk and yoghurt..most importantly is maintaining a good body weight and exercising well..work out your whole body well.

Obese men are 54 percent more at risk...a lot of changes like these are needed to really reduce the risk.
 
If we watch other mammals they usually give us all the answers, hormone driven behaviour, from both genders dictate frequency. It's all about survival of the species, more kids the better, and hormones regulate the urges in a natural environment that is, frequency.

Modern day civilisation is really a new thing in the history of our species. I love modern times and hate how we are artificially triggered into confusion. Humans are a hairy, smelly, bad breath mammal, with bugs in our hair, not shaven, made up, sweet smelling, alluring creatures, it's all about hormones, and in natural environment this works perfectly, if it didn't we wouldn't exist today.

A lot of ethics comes from religion that is good as it helps mass society not destroy itself, but it didn't exist before language, only God/love and life on earth did for the millions of years before this language driven time we are immersed in.

I'm not a creationist or religious just following logic.

I really don't know if cancer is artificially amplified or not, I listen to scientists with proven records what else can I do, I've been surrounded by death from it my whole life and I hate it, it sucks I don't know how it happens, I just wish it didn't exist.

Sexual compulsion is weird, and difficult because it keeps our species alive and isn't a bad thing at its core. I know i would put sex above water in some scenarios, I know the spider risks it's life for it. No I'm not comparing us to spiders, but sex isn't a cigarette either, it takes over logic because species survival is more important than our happiness. But neither am I saying doing things you don't want to do is ok. The problems with compulsions are obvious, we all know them.

I know we go in cycles every few days as men, not from the books I've read but from personal experiance.

So should we do it over 20 times a month, who knows man, I wasn't around 10,000 years ago beforee language and all the amazing and insane culture it brought, but I agree we have bodily functions and when we repress them it usually makes something go wrong from shitting to sleeping, crying to sweating we are designed to let things out. Answers usually lie in the basics, what happens to a chimp if it doesn't, I know bonobos that share close to 99 percent of our DNAs are at it all day but that's a social culture for them, and yes no guilt involved as there is no formal language to judge them for it, every mamals and animal on planet earth actually lol.

But again it's probably just hormones and whatever season of life you are in that dictates frequency.

Ahh what do I know, I'm no scientist, dr or psychologist, just following what I see in nature and logic. As from a religious or agnostic perspective our limbs and organs are the same as all mammals just we have a more complex brain, the rest is pretty much identical (brains,lungs, legs and balls ) so I always think what are they doing in their natural habitat?

Interesting find mate thanks
 
The resulting PSAS from that kind of ejaculation frequency will cause enlargement of the prostate and the chronic blasting of the urehtra by the poor quality semen(diluted from overejaculation) will cause non-bacterial urethritis.

Go look up where in the world the lowest rates of prostate cancer are. It's those countries where women are not allowed to wear revealing clothing, to put it mildly. I'm not advocating for that, but I'm seeing a correlation. In those places where men don't get constantly sexually aroused by triggers in the environment, there are the lowest prostate cancer rates.

Obviously, the solution is not to dress women in big black bags with only a slit to see through like they do over there. I'm sure the reader can think of this in a nuanced way as I can. Instead of jumping to extreme measures, we can start with removing all the pornography, and we'll be well upon our way to lowering those rates back to how they likely were in the west before modern times. I'm unable to find data about prostate cancer rates that goes back before the sexual revolution. If anyone can find that, please share. It would be interesting to see if it supports my hypothesis.
 
Back
Top