Tonight, I have wittnessed attempted rape

she-dernatinus said:
Because small communities don't have records of sexual abuse ?
Their numbers exceed 30 000 people, they are at least 76 000. And I don't care about how you evaluate them, as long as they present more interesting traits to me.
Click to expand...

Well, your personal interest on their traits won't make them successful cultures any time soon, nor a model to replicate on already vastly more successful cultures.
 
SickSicko said:
traits won't make them successful cultures any time soon, nor a model to replicate on already vastly more successful cultures
Click to expand...
They certainly are much more interesting than what you give them credit for. And nothing guarantees it's impossible to reproduce them at large scale. In order to begin doing so, the same cultural structure needs to be implemented, the scale doesn't matter that much.

Why do you believe even the smallest villages in our cultures have records of sexual offenses, while those 76 000 individuals do not even have a term for those type of crimes ?
 
she-dernatinus said:
They certainly are much more interesting than what you give them credit for. And nothing guarantees it's impossible to reproduce them at large scale. In order to begin doing so, the same cultural structure needs to be implemented, the scale doesn't matter that much.
Click to expand...

Get real for a second, if they were actually reproduceable at a larger scale, on 12.000 years of history we would have some big one around, but the hard truth is, those cultures sucumb against the other ones if they would try to compete for a bigger share of the pie, why? I don't know, I let you to wonder, they are not successful or escalable.

There are also minor cultures where numbers don't exist, and they are extremely small, as many drawbacks and horrors our cultures may have, they are also the most successful ones, reality, and the fact that our cultures vastly outnumber the others, is just testimony of it.
 
It is Finished said:
Porn literally does the opposite. Why would anyone in their right mind go through the hassle of trying to rape a female when they could just sit in a dark comfortable room and wack them self off to porn over and over again. Backwards logic much?
Click to expand...
Porn makes you a monster. That is nothing but fax. It makes you wanna do incest, makes you a sex monster etc. Porn should be illegal man.
 
PatrickBasedman said:
Having no word for rape doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
Click to expand...

True, true.

In northern Australia there is an aboriginal tribe that has no word for "right" or for "left." One does not have a "right" hand or a "left" hand. It must be described as a "north" hand or a "south" hand or an "east" hand or a "west" hand. It is a culture which must always be aware of the four primary directions. But certainly, this lack of vocabulary does not mean they do not have "right" or "left" hands as we anglophones consider them.

In much of Asia, there is no word in the language for "brother" or for "sister." This includes Chinese, Thai, Lao, etc. One must always specify if that sibling is "older" or "younger." Status and rank are imposed by the language. Does this mean that Chinese people don't have brothers or sisters? Of course not. They just have older and younger ones.

The lack of a word does not mean there is a lack of the thing described by it. Speaking of "things," Chinese doesn't have a true word for "thing." In Chinese, if you want to say "thing" you say "east-west." Putting those two directions together describes the concept of "thing." I guess every"thing" under the sun can be summed up by those two directions.

Which culture is it, by the way, that has no word for rape?
 
SickSicko said:
Get real for a second, if they were actually reproduceable at a larger scale, on 12.000 years of history we would have some big one around, but the hard truth is, those cultures sucumb against the other ones if they would try to compete for a bigger share of the pie, why? I don't know, I let you to wonder, they are not successful or escalable.
Click to expand...
The importance for me is that they prove that rape isn't a fatality. And those cultures aren't ideal either, while they lack a word for rape, they have a word for murder and theft. And the idea that just because we don't have some huge large-scale example doesn't mean that altering the cultures in our civilizations to match theirs, wouldn't lead to similar outcomes.

SickSicko said:
There are also minor cultures where numbers don't exist, and they are extremely small, as many drawbacks and horrors our cultures may have, they are also the most successful ones, reality, and the fact that our cultures vastly outnumber the others, is just testimony of it.
Click to expand...
The misunderstanding you have is that the cultures I am speaking of aren't minor, they are numerous enough to be considered proper ethnicities. Frankly, I don't think our cultures are that successful, if anything we are the ones mostly heading toward self-destruction.
 
SickSicko said:
Get real for a second, if they were actually reproduceable at a larger scale, on 12.000 years of history we would have some big one around, but the hard truth is, those cultures sucumb against the other ones if they would try to compete for a bigger share of the pie, why? I don't know, I let you to wonder, they are not successful or escalable.
Click to expand...
Aren't most men from patriarchal societies also repulsed by rape? Keep in mind that while patriarchal societies approach sexuality in a way that puts emphasis on male sexual superiority, and due to it, has constructed many detrimental standards toward women, most men are able to recognize rape as horrific.

If all the epistemological sexual phallo-centrism, and the discriminatory standards present in our cultures are far from sufficient to turn most men into rapists, then can you imagine what the result would be, in case we implemented the same cultural system as those matriarchal societies?
 
Last edited:
she-dernatinus said:
And why would I want you ? Not every woman is dumb enough to settle with a toxic man like you. Personally I see no good quality in you.
Click to expand...
You tell me. I’ve already noticed you use arguments that I’ve made against you, with other people. More than once now. Clearly I’m rubbing off on you a little bit. So to say that you see absolutely no good quality in me, is obviously a lie. It’s ok, I shouldn’t have said this in front of everyone. Your reaction is expected.
 
It is Finished said:
You tell me. I’ve already noticed you use arguments that I’ve made against you, with other people
Click to expand...
I don't see exactly what you mean, but I am not interested in the response anyways.

It is Finished said:
Clearly I’m rubbing off on you a little bit. So to say that you see absolutely no good quality in me, is obviously a lie.
Click to expand...
I'll tell you why you are completely delusional with your idea. In order for you to have any effect on me, I either need to be attracted physically to you, or for you to possess personality traits I find decent and appealing. The first possibility is impossible, I have no idea what you look like. The second possibility is also refuted, since after our interaction, I can't find any decent personality traits in you.
 
she-dernatinus said:
I don't see exactly what you mean, but I am not interested in the response anyways.


I'll tell you why you are completely delusional with your idea. In order for you to have any effect on me, I either need to be attracted physically to you, or for you to possess personality traits I find decent and appealing. The first possibility is impossible, I have no idea what you look like. The second possibility is also refuted, since after our interaction, I can't find any decent personality traits in you.
Click to expand...
That’s a clever way of trying to get me to show you what I look like. It’s not going to work. You should be more upfront and stop trying to use hints, and maybe I’ll consider it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top