I am impressed by your capacity of denial. Yet, none of you could provide a possible, non-criminal, alternative that actually made sense
It’s very possible it was criminal activity, whether or not the intent was gang rape with video, is another story. Anyways I’m still waiting for you to show me the statistics on incidence of rape and the introduction of pornography?
He was probably calling his buddies to help him out by carrying her so he wouldn't have to drag her, that could be why he called them to "join in". This is all speculation of course but there are more alternatives than just rape. You should be equally open to all possibilities. She might've been doing drugs and she owed them money so they wanted to scare her into paying back, I've actually witnessed that myself once.
So long as you actually provide me with what I asked for, I have no reason to deny evidence. Knowing you, you'll try to link some study about porn and psychology, which is completely irrelevant. The question is whether or not porn leads to higher incidence of rape. It should be very easily proven by statistics. My hypothesis, would be the exact opposite. I'm happy to be proven wrong though. Seems you don't want to look into this because it just might shatter all of your misconceptions.
We have gang rape because we also are a phallocentric society, and our men interact with women through the lens of entitlement and with denigrating views upon them. But hard drugs have never been introduced to our community.
And why would those studies be irrelevant ? Isn't a proof of psychological influence more than sufficient to prove you wrong ? Psychology is the science of the human mind after all
Let's see how long you can avoid looking into evidence that has a high potential of shattering your false analyses of the world. Stop stalling.
Uh no.. because that would be playing in the land of assumption and 2+2=5 (your favourite place). Just because porn can alter some men's perspectives does not mean it creates higher incidences of rape. The fact that you can't understand that is pretty telling. The proof is in the pudding, has rape increased or not since the introduction of pornography.. it doesn't get any simpler than that.
Just because they're different from your immediate assumption doesn't make them delusional. It's easy to paint anyone as a monster when you only have one side of the story and in this case it's from someone not even directly involved in the situation. You just want people to agree with your assessment that they were going to rape her so you can go on a tirade of how all men are scum and how women are innocent victims, which even if it is true they wanted to rape this woman, you're still wrong. What country do you live in?
I definitely won't take your word for it. I don't care what 1 psychopath blamed his psychopathy on. Imagine having an excuse like that for being an absolutely demented psychopath, when there are hundreds of millions of non-psychotic porn users.
