Tonight, I have wittnessed attempted rape

Our private conversation was perfectly fine, I’ve not thought anything of it. I just see you spouting off ridiculous claims all over the place and I feel compelled to call you out on it. Why don’t you defend your actual statement instead of creating diversions.

 

Let’s work this out together ok? There are more male criminals in general, across all crime, as seen in the number of male vs female prisoners, correct? So, if there are more male criminals, there’s probably a good chance of being more male rapists, correct? Now if the majority of males are heterosexual, they’re going to target women, correct? Would that explain why there are more males raping females than there are females raping men?

 

I don’t even know what you’re referring to specifically. I thought you were a little more mature than to defend your baseless claims with more assumptions about unrelated topics.

 

What do you re-read? There’s about 14 pages. I’m really curious as to what you think bothered me so much about that conversation.

 

Your words are failing you. When I asked you to clarify about men and women committing murder and burglary at equals rates, you claimed you were referring to the fact that they target each gender equally. Are you now claiming that burglary and murder are committed at equal rates for both men and women?

 

For someone who’s studied to become an electrical engineer, you sure do have an odd habit of making claims and expecting people to take your word for it. In the academic world, would you get away with making these claims without discussing the actually difference in percentages? I don’t think so, so I’m not sure why you continue to play in this fairy tale world where everyone should just assume that your interpretation of something is correct. If you continue like this I’ll have to end the conversation, again, as it’s completely useless.

Please, don’t flatter yourself. If you’ve created confusion as to what argument youre making because of your poor communication, then you should acknowledge that.

 

A stop on the way down for a reader.

Hello! We're at a benchmark here.

2 more pages will be twelve! Perhaps there will be 12 more additional pages!

 

Really? My intellectual laziness, or yours? Let’s see:

Based on what you’ve said here, one would assume that you know what those rates actually are. What prevents you from referencing what they are, instead of expecting me to assume your interpretation is correct? Is it because you either a) don’t actually know what the rates are, or b) that would leave room for your interpretation of the facts to be debated?

You accused me of being easily confused. Did you forget that? If your communication isn’t perfect because of your language discrepancy, than perhaps you should humble yourself and admit that, rather than throwing insults.

I’m assuming you’re talking about my supposed irritation from our private conversation again? Yeah, I have no idea what you’re hinting at about 16 pages of conversation. Seriously, only a woman would find it logical to accuse someone of being bothered by a previous conversation, and then refuse to reference specifics. Then complain that a man isn’t getting the hint. You are embodying female degeneracy right now.