Tonight, I have wittnessed attempted rape

Hahahahaha, I see you're still sour because of our last private conversation. I didn't know you were such an emotional guy.
Our private conversation was perfectly fine, I’ve not thought anything of it. I just see you spouting off ridiculous claims all over the place and I feel compelled to call you out on it. Why don’t you defend your actual statement instead of creating diversions.
 
Our private conversation was perfectly fine, I’ve not thought anything of it. I just see you spouting off ridiculous claims all over the place and I feel compelled to call you out on it. Why don’t you defend your actual statement instead of creating diversions.
I still think you did, it's obvious. You weren't happy at all with it. I think it's so hilarious.
 
most women are also heterosexual, but don't molest pre-adolescent males as much as men rape and abuse women.
Let’s work this out together ok? There are more male criminals in general, across all crime, as seen in the number of male vs female prisoners, correct? So, if there are more male criminals, there’s probably a good chance of being more male rapists, correct? Now if the majority of males are heterosexual, they’re going to target women, correct? Would that explain why there are more males raping females than there are females raping men?
 
Let’s work this out together ok? There are more male criminals in general, across all crime, as seen in the number of male vs female prisoners, correct? So, if there are more male criminals, there’s probably a good chance of being more male rapists, correct? Now if the majority of males are heterosexual, they’re going to target women, correct? Would that explain why there are more males raping females than there are females raping men?
Nope , don't try to ignore the drastic gap between genders for each type of crime. If you take each criminal behavior, you won't find such a significant difference between sexes. But when it comes to sexual abuse, the difference is impressive. I remember you told me how much you valued prominence.
 
Nope , don't try to ignore the drastic gap between genders for each type of crime. If you take each criminal behavior, you won't find such a significant difference between sexes. But when it comes to sexual abuse, the difference is impressive. I remember you told me how much you valued prominence.
Your words are failing you. When I asked you to clarify about men and women committing murder and burglary at equals rates, you claimed you were referring to the fact that they target each gender equally. Are you now claiming that burglary and murder are committed at equal rates for both men and women?
 
you claimed you were referring to the fact that they target each gender equally. Are you now claiming that burglary and murder are committed at equal rates for both men and women?
I didn't know you were so easily confused. Both murder and burglary are committed by both men and women, and the difference in the rates per gender isn't significant enough to largely associate such crimes with a specific sex. The targets are chosen regardless of gender concerning each crime stated. The same cannot be said for sexual abuse, both the first and second observations are refuted in this case.
 
Your words are failing you. When I asked you to clarify about men and women committing murder and burglary at equals rates, you claimed you were referring to the fact that they target each gender equally. Are you now claiming that burglary and murder are committed at equal rates for both men and women?
Do you understand now ?
 
For someone who’s studied to become an electrical engineer, you sure do have an odd habit of making claims and expecting people to take your word for it. In the academic world, would you get away with making these claims without discussing the actually difference in percentages? I don’t think so, so I’m not sure why you continue to play in this fairy tale world where everyone should just assume that your interpretation of something is correct. If you continue like this I’ll have to end the conversation, again, as it’s completely useless.
Do you understand now ?
Please, don’t flatter yourself. If you’ve created confusion as to what argument youre making because of your poor communication, then you should acknowledge that.
 
A stop on the way down for a reader.

Hello! We're at a benchmark here.

2 more pages will be twelve! Perhaps there will be 12 more additional pages! :)
 
Please, don’t flatter yourself. If you’ve created confusion as to what argument youre making because of your poor communication, then you should acknowledge that.
Excuse me, English isn't my native language. You seem to have forgotten that.

For someone who’s studied to become an electrical engineer, you sure do have an odd habit of making claims and expecting people to take your word for it.
I think this is a symptom of your intellectual laziness, you always expect others to spoon-feed you the answers you look for.

In the academic world, would you get away with making these claims without discussing the actually difference in percentages? I don’t think so, so I’m not sure why you continue to play in this fairy tale world where everyone should just assume that your interpretation of something is correct.
Oh, you'd be shocked at the reality of the academic world. It's not only percentages and calculations we need to take into consideration, but also the bias of the professors tutoring us during the research. Sometimes, when encountering very stubborn professors, we need to make sure our conclusions align with their interpretations.
 
Ain’t nobody reading this. Unless they are interested in seeing how a woman argues when she’s become highly emotional. If that’s the case, I recommend the last few pages.
I think it's more interesting to see how an edgy, emotional guy gets easily confused and find trouble reaching conclusions, even when all the hints are at his disposal.
 
I think this is a symptom of your intellectual laziness, you always expect others to spoon-feed you the answers you look for.
Really? My intellectual laziness, or yours? Let’s see:
Both murder and burglary are committed by both men and women, and the difference in the rates per gender isn't significant enough to largely associate such crimes with a specific sex.
Based on what you’ve said here, one would assume that you know what those rates actually are. What prevents you from referencing what they are, instead of expecting me to assume your interpretation is correct? Is it because you either a) don’t actually know what the rates are, or b) that would leave room for your interpretation of the facts to be debated?
Excuse me, English isn't my native language. You seem to have forgotten that.
You accused me of being easily confused. Did you forget that? If your communication isn’t perfect because of your language discrepancy, than perhaps you should humble yourself and admit that, rather than throwing insults.
I think it's more interesting to see how an edgy, emotional guy gets easily confused and find trouble reaching conclusions, even when all the hints are at his disposal.
I’m assuming you’re talking about my supposed irritation from our private conversation again? Yeah, I have no idea what you’re hinting at about 16 pages of conversation. Seriously, only a woman would find it logical to accuse someone of being bothered by a previous conversation, and then refuse to reference specifics. Then complain that a man isn’t getting the hint. You are embodying female degeneracy right now.
 
Is it because you either a) don’t actually know what the rates are, or b) that would leave room for your interpretation of the facts to be debated?
I can't pretend knowing the rates with exact precision, then again all it matters in the case is that the difference in burglary/murder crime rate between sexes wouldn't be as pronounced as in sexual offenses. And, yes, seeing documentaries about female prisoners, made me realize it's way more likely for women to murder and commit theft. This is why the signs, given by the media, don't highlight the idea of gender disparity- in the crimes you stated- being that significant.

You accused me of being easily confused. Did you forget that? If your communication isn’t perfect because of your language discrepancy than perhaps you should humble yourself and admit that, rather than throwing insults.
Even with my occasional language discrepancy, I think my point was clear and straightforward enough for you to connect the dots.
I’m assuming you’re talking about my supposed irradiation from our private conversation again? Yeah, I have no idea what you’re hinting at about 16 pages of conversation. Seriously, only a woman would find it logical to accuse someone of being bothered by a previous conversation, and then refuse to reference specifics. Then complain that a man isn’t getting the hint. You are embodying female degeneracy right now.
Oh, I am sure you will not take notice of your own irritation. This is something really spontaneous for you, and you have no restrain when being upset. I also notice, that whenever you feel upset at something I've said, you tend to imply that my feminity plays a role in it, somehow being the cause behind a 'deficiency' you'll accuse me of. It's the most recurrent sign you display when becoming overwhelmed by anger and irritability. I beginning to find it funny and cute at the same time.
 
Back
Top