Yeah I couldn't agree more. Kink shaming threads like this make NoFap look bad, and this site already struggles with a bad reputation.
Well, I respectfully disagree with what your saying. Yes, it’s true that not everyone who watches porn will become a serial killer. I get that. But I believe it’s set a horrible precedent for people to follow when violence gets people busting nuts. It desensitizes people to the idea of sexual violence. Don’t get me wrong, I know porn isn’t going to be banned. Which is why porn needs regulations and laws that make sense. I can’t stand to see the lawlessness that porn has while every other industry has to have rules and regulations in place.
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50073102 That's what happens when a government tries to introduce ID to see porn. Once you start needing ID for porn, what's next? no anonymity allowed on twitter because so many people are posting illegal stuff that's racist, homophobic and terror-related? No anonymity online = no sites like this.
it already has regulation and clearly states at the beginning of (legal)movie that it is a fiction, if someone is stupid enough to believe it is real he should not be allowed to use tv/social/media/internet/book in the first place.
Porn stuff won't be banned if there's someone who's gaining from it, believe me. I want all porn to be banned but I understand that there's someone who's making money from it and... You can't just ban it. It's not that simple. I'm pretty sure that with time porn industry will fall, but not today, not tomorrow, not even after 5 years. It takes time.
So, jerking off to rape isn’t the same as raping a person. I mean, I can see what your saying. But, it’s still weird, in my opinion.
Most people aren’t aware of the warning labels anyway. The porn clips don’t give adult content warnings. Alcohol has warning labels on the bottles and their is a cashier to check for ID. With porn, the warning labels are very discreet and there is no ID to check for internet porn.
Interesting. So your saying that ID for internet porn would lead to mass government surveillance on free speech. Never would think of that. But is the British Government a Constitutional Monarchy tho? I would like to see if this ever occurred in democratic societies like western Europe and America, for example.
Are we talking about actual FILMED RAPE? Or are we talking about rape fetish videos, which are not actually rape?
So, rape fetish porn isn’t rape because the person jerking off to the rape fetish porn isn’t being the rapist. Kinda weird, but I think I’m understanding your point of view.
Bro im about to get myself banned if you don't start understanding this. Rape fetish porn is made with actors. They aren't actually raping people. But it looks like they are, because that's the fetish. There is no rapist.
even if porn industry fall it won't change anything these day "amateur" porn is becoming the main thing.
gb is as democratic as they come and if you think the government is not spying on people using the internet just try looking for some child porn, no one want to be know for using porn so if it start requiring id everyone will just go to the dark web and look at worst thing.