I want to know .....can ..not masturbating lead to prostrate cancer

You cannot link fe to ie. Mathematical logic cannot be extended to biology.
I repeat sir, Those statements I made are not to be analysed mathematically, they have been inserted there just to give An idea of how an occurrence of event A implying event B does not necessarily mean Un-occurrence of A implies Un-Occurence of B in real world, which is not bounded to the solely to the framework of True/False.

I’m saying that the paper dosen’t talk about any results of infrequent ejaculation.
The Title of the thread talks about Infrequent Ejaculation, and not about Frequent Ejaculation. Hence The results of that paper cannot be applied here.

 

You know this is deep when a simple biological question turns into maths

 

@thinking_differently I guess I am confused about the point you are trying to make. When you said

I assumed that you were trying to use mathematical logic to explain the implications of the study I mentioned. But now you say

So why did you introduce it to this thread?

Let's put the emotive subjects of masturbation and prostate cancer aside and try an analogy. Suppose I found a study showing

What conclusions would you draw from that study? You appear to be saying that we cannot draw the conclusion "doing no exercise at all will increase your risk of coronary heart disease", i.e. the statement "people who exercise frequently have lower rates of coronary heart disease" tellls us nothing useful about people who do not exercise. Is that really what you are saying?

 

Yes sir.

 

And also the considering the fact that we do not understand the Mechanism that causes the increase in risk.