What's your opinion on Andrew Tate ?

But you realize you just exposed your biggest insecurity in doing all this right? You just exposed a giant glowing sign that says "manipulate me!"

 

You admitted you manipulated everyone because you don't want to be manipulated. Also this kind of stuff is a HUGE red flag for anyone in your social life.

 

Alright, you're going too far now. Putting aside the topic for a moment, there's no need to be so bitchy with regards to other users, it doesn't help your argument, it demolishes it into little pieces. You're being more sexist than anyone else on here by implying TakingTheSteps is a pickme, which is unfathomably dumb considering I'm pretty sure she's married.

Women are not a hive mind that all have to agree with you on every issue. This insane tribalism of yours, that I keep seeing across off-topic threads is destroying any realistic chance of having a meaningful discussion. Do you not realize you're turning people against your point, even if they might otherwise be receptive to it?

 

What manipulation can happen on this site that you would be so worried about? Worrying about what people really think? My thinking is that you can only take people at face value, if deception is at play, that's on them, not you.

 

@she-dernatinus Stop treating this discussion forum like it's Reddit, thanks.

 

Yes, because that is exactly what's going on here. You absolutely weren't trying to troll and are upset it didn't go your way. In the words of true feminist icon, Carmela Soprano,

 

If I was a psychopath or sociopath and I read this forum, you exposed yourself as a target. Most of the people who watch Andrew Tate don't care about some person on NoFap's forum, They'd be in Hustler's University or trying to make money some other way, or they're too dumb to manipulate you. The real psychopath's don't watch Andrew Tate, they're invisible and lurk until they find their mark, which you just exposed yourself in this entire thread.

 

You can have this super moral goal, and this elaborate way of doing it, but you're just a jerk.

 

@she-dernatinus Ok look, the thing is you tried to play some manipulation tactics here.
I can completely understand where you are coming from and what your aim was, but let me tell you this, considering people in this place is shielded by anonymity, yes openly stating your true feelings about Tate, and your truthful position about it, would have brought in any advocate of him to defend him and you would have accomplished what you wanted to do.

I know we have quite different opinions, but I can understand your concern, but resourcing to such tactics is in fighting fire with fire, you just attempted to do what you want to avoid done to you, and rightfully so, but just consider that.

It was silly, it didn't fit your character or the views people here we know you have, it wasn't even required for anyone to intervene, I recon even meshuga noticed the discrepancy, as you speaking in a softer and more bening way about Tate, than you apparently did about Jordan Peterson, when Tate is far FAR more despicable in terms of misogyny, something we know you have a warranted zero policy about, but also very very strong views that makes you interpret many things as signs of this.

Again, being upfront would have very likely derived on a more constructive argument where both supporters and detractors would get involved, and you would have get what you wanted, now, you just pictured yourself as the sociopathic and manipulative one, even if your intentions may or may have not come from a different place.

Think about it.

 

You don't need to set random traps on the internet, you need to see a therapist. Please don't rope me into your trauma, I got enough.