1. Welcome to NoFap! We have disabled new forum accounts from being registered for the time being. In the meantime, you can join our weekly accountability groups.
    Dismiss Notice

(Edited)How ejaculation works with dopamine?

Discussion in 'Rebooting - Porn Addiction Recovery' started by ASD_OZ, Nov 14, 2017.

Was the topic understandable ? (important for me)

  1. Yes

    1 vote(s)
    100.0%
  2. Nay

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. ASD_OZ

    ASD_OZ Fapstronaut

    36
    31
    28
    I sometimes find it odd about how the scientific benefits of no PMO works.
    Specifically about masturbating.
    Before I begin , I want to mention that I'm specifically talking about when you ejaculate in general (from sex or masturbation)

    Lets say , you relapse at the 100th.
    You don't lose all the benefits from just one time. but how much will you lose ?(if you lose , ya know ...)

    My little own theory : every time you ejaculate , your "benefits level" is reduced by 10 days or "lvl points".

    Example : at 100th day(or "benefits level") you relapse -> you lose 10 days/points.

    This is of course just my speculation from personal experience.
    But I would like to know if there's any link to an article that answers my question

    Update : it seems I have mixed between relapse and ejaculation.
    My apologies.
    So I'll explain myself like this :
    One of the benefits of no PMO is having a more dopamine than you had while doing PMO. dopamine ,in-short, is something that gives up motivational drive to do anything.
    *video below is explains about dopamine more deeply*


    So , the more days pass and you don't ejaculate, the more dopamine you have to spent on other activities.
    Of course sex doesn't come daily (unless you're a pick-up artist).
    The question is , when you do ejaculate , how much dopamine you spent ?
     
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2017
  2. maz20

    maz20 Fapstronaut

    71
    30
    18
    Depends on what you mean by "relapse". I'd say there is quite the spectrum, between once or twice just to loosen up the physical organs, or having a longer binge session over a long time. Also, I wouldn't consider sex as "relapsing" -- technically the whole point of "sex drive" is to have "sex" anyway.

    Note: just in case hiding the rest of the post below ; )
    Note: IMO, the whole purpose of fapping is simply --- in between long stretches of 'no sex' (several days/weeks?) --- to occassionally 'de-repress' the physical part of sex drive, so that both psychological and physical parts of sex drive can later work together or synchronize as/when needed or desired. NoFap works great at expanding the psychological sex drive but, without sex, it eventually leads to a repression of the other "half" (but also necessary part) of the sex drive --- the physical part. Over time (or course of several attempts at NoFap), this repression of physical sex drive can easily become a subconscious process, occurring even well below the person's own awareness --- the underlying cause of what is often here called, "flatline".

    Likewise, the message of "NoFap", IMO, is to simply point out that using fap/pmo beyond the limited scope described above is, quite frankly, not a very good idea. To phrase it somewhat more "dogmatically" : sex drive shouldn't revolve around some minor "loosener" of its physical portion.
     
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2017
    Deleted Account likes this.
  3. Some people need to abstain from PMO entirely, and then slowly incorporate sex back in, depending on how bad the addiction is. As you said though, it's called "sex drive" for a reason and that shouldn't count as a relapse as that's one of the most natural things you can do.
     
    ASD_OZ likes this.
  4. Third_Eye

    Third_Eye Fapstronaut

    261
    1,717
    123
    Well, if you have a long streak, it could be possible to not lose much if you ejaculate once.

    But if you binge-relapse, you’ll lose a whole lot, and I’m talking from personal experience
     
  5. bike-wrench

    bike-wrench Fapstronaut

    I doubt there's any research or article on it. But I also doubt that there's a single response. A relapse on day 2 isn't really a relapse; it's a continuation of a behavior. And the meaning of a relapse for one person will be different from its meaning to someone else. And, of course, not all ejaculations are relapses. There are people on this forum with years of recovery time and who are in committed relationships. If they ejaculate with their committed partner, does that lose them points? Is the ejaculation from an unintentional wet dream equivalent to the ejaculation after an hours-long edging session from a relapse?

    I don't think I would find it useful to think this way. I'd be thinking "Well, if I get up to day 100, and I only lose ten day-points, maybe I can risk just one time!"... and that kind of thinking got me back here after years of a relapse.

    I'm sure I'm missing the point of your argument, but I'm equally sure I'd manipulate it, even if I had it right.
     
    Third_Eye and Deleted Account like this.
  6. maz20

    maz20 Fapstronaut

    71
    30
    18
    In general, though, I'd only recommend "complete abstinence" from PMO only for those very new (or still somewhat new) to NoFap. Basically, guys who never did NoFap or had only a few minor attempts are less likely to enter "flatline" -- i.e., the time when all things NoFap start to become, frustratingly, too subconscious or "second-nature" (compared to what may have earlier been a quite a "conscious" struggle!).

    Granted, it's technically just a part of the natural human learning process --- i.e., what was once quite a "conscious" effort or a struggle will over time ease into becoming a more second-nature and subconscious thing. But, in this case, it can be frustrating, leaving the person feeling like they have no "conscious" or voluntary control over sex drive (as in, they can't just ramp it up and/or lower it "at will", completely however/whenever they consciously want to). Although, given that sex drive is a somewhat semi-subconscious thing anyway to begin with, it probably shouldn't be that surprising!
     
    ASD_OZ likes this.

Share This Page